如何回复审稿人的意见？（总结）

以下是从网上搜索过来的、一些回复审稿人信的写法：

Dear Professor xx:

Thank you very much for your letter dated xxx xx xxxx, and the referees’ reports. Based on your comment and request, we have made extensive modification on the original manuscript. Here, we attached revised manuscript in the formats of both PDF and MS word, for your approval. A document answering every question from the referees was also summarized and enclosed.

A revised manuscript with the correction sections red marked was attached as the supplemental material and for easy check/editing purpose.

Should you have any questions, please contact us without hesitate.

Dear reviewer:
I am very grateful to your comments for the manuscript. According with your advice, we amended the relevant part in manuscript. Some of your questions were answered below.
1）
2）
....

Our manuscript entitled, ¨****¨ has been carefully revised according to Reviewers’ suggestions. Now I answer the questions one-by-one.

About the English writing of the manuscript, we ask for native English speaker to revise the paper before it was submitted to the magazine and this time. I don’t know whether it has reached to your magazine’s standard.

Thank you very much.

Sincerely,
***

Answers to REVIEW 1
1. ****.
Answer:
2. ****.
Answer:
...

Answers to REVIEW 2
1. ****.
Answer:
2. ****.
Answer:
...

Dear Editor:

Thank you for your kind letter of “......” on November **, 2005. We revised the manuscript in accordance with the reviewers’ comments, and carefully proof-read the manuscript to minimize typographical, grammatical, and bibliographical errors.

Here below is our description on revision according to the reviewers’ comments.

Part A (Reviewer 1)
1. The reviewer’s comment: ......
The authors’ Answer: .....
2. The reviewer’s comment: ......
The authors’ Answer: .....
...
...

Part B (Reviewer 2)
1. The reviewer’s comment: ......
The authors’ Answer: .....
2. The reviewer’s comment: ......
The authors’ Answer: .....
...
...

Many grammatical or typographical errors have been revised.

All the lines and pages indicated above are in the revised manuscript.

Thank you and all the reviewers for the kind advice.

Sincerely yours,
***

Dear Dr. Fay Riordan:
Thank you very much for your attention and the referee’s evaluation and comments on our paper BXXXXK. We have revised the manuscript according to your kind advices and referee’s detailed suggestions. Enclosed please find the responses to the referees. We sincerely hope this manuscript will be finally acceptable to be published on XXX.

Thank you very much for all your help and looking forward to hearing from you soon.

Best regards

Sincerely yours

Dr. XXX

Please find the following Response to the comments of referees:

Response to the referee’s comments
Referee A
Comment 1: The titania material formed after calcining at 450 oC is not characterized. XRD of these calcined materials should be provided to understand the crystallinity and phase.
Response: Thanks for the referee’s kind suggestion. According to his/her advices, X-ray diffractometry spectroscopy (XRD) of the calcined TiO2 film was given in Supporting Information (Figure S1) in this revised version. It illustrated that the hydrothermal synthesized TiO2 materials after calcining at 450 oC is entire anatase, which was confirmed by the X-ray diffractometer with Cu Kα radiation (Rigaku D/ max-2500).

Comment 2: The authors must state the mechanical strength of these materials after the removal of PS by calcinations.
Response: Thanks for the referee’s suggestion. By a scotch tape peel test, the TiO2 film can’t be stripped from the conducting glass substrate, which indicates that the mechanical strength of as-prepared composite film is strong enough for the fabrication of solar cell devices. The revised details can be found in Line 165-168, page 2.

Referee B
Comment 1: The microtube structure with the size of 500-800 nm cannot only scatter the visible light in the region of 500-800 nm, but also can scatter more efficiently the visible light in the region below 500 nm, and can scatter near infrared light. This point should be clarified in the main text.
Response: Thanks for the referee’s kind advice. Just like what the referee said, the microtube network structure can scatter not only visible light but also near infrared light. We added this point in revised manuscript and the detailed revision can be found in Line 194-205, Page 2-3.
Comment 2: They described the simulated sunlight as "one-simulating-sunlight condition (AM1.5, 100 mW cm-2)". But in my opinion, it would be better to use the phrase like "AM 1.5 simulated solar light (100 mW cm-2)".
Response: Thanks for the referee’s suggestion. "one-simulating-sunlight condition (AM1.5, 100 mW cm-2)" has been changed to "AM 1.5 simulated solar light (100 mW cm-2)" in our revised manuscript. (Line 217, Page 3)
Comment 3: They correctly pointed out that the increased ratio of solar energy conversion efficiency by the microtube-network structure was smaller than that estimated from the absorption spectra. It is understandable, considering that a TiO2 porous film was filled with solvent in a device, while that for spectroscopic measurements is filled with air.
Response: Thanks for the referee’s good evaluation and kind suggestion. The referee’s explanation is very correct. Light absorptions of TiO2 photoelectrodes are different when they are filled with electrolytes and air, respectively. It is ascribed to that a part of solar light will be absorbed by the electrolytes and also different medium in the porous film will induce the different refractive indices. This is one reason that increased ratio of conversion efficiency by the microtube-network structure was smaller than that estimated from the absorption spectra. We added this point into our revised manuscript and the details can be found in Line 325-330, Page 4.

如何回复审稿人的意见？（总结）相关推荐

如何回复SCI审稿人评审意见（response letter）
如何高效地回复审稿意见?(上) 如何高效地回复审稿意见?(中) 如何高效地回复审稿意见?(下) 如何高效回复审稿人意见(附实例) 如何高效的回复审稿人意见? 如何正确回复审稿意见(附模板) 如何有效回 ...
不知道如何回复审稿人意见？回复模板来了！
千盼万盼好不容易修回来了,一看意见 30-40条,直接崩溃! 当拿到审稿意见时,千万不要气馁,因为一次性被录用的概率太低了,所以我们要做的事就是: 不断修改论文不断修改论文不断修改论文然后写好& ...
速收藏！回复审稿人意见时常用的英文套话
拿到审稿意见时... 下面收集了一些回复审稿人意见时常用的套话,赶紧收藏!(搬运工具人.gif) 一些回复的模板模板1 Dear prof. XX and dear reviewers Re: Ma ...
回复审稿人意见——硕士期间我De第一篇SCI
2019年4月1日,我正式接触硕士期间的研究课题--用深度学习研究轴承故障诊断. 滚动轴承作为机械设备的易损部件,其健康状态对整个机械设备的性能.稳定性及使用寿命有着巨大影响.建立稳定可靠的实时故障诊 ...
【论文写作】-我的第一篇论文形成记(投稿过程、课题来源、python与数学学习、实验设计、论文思路建立与写作、回复审稿人)
我的第一篇论文形成记投稿过程背景记录课题来源-本科毕业设计 python及数学学习实验设计调参阶段实验阶段论文思路建立论文写作回复审稿人总结投稿过程 2022年12月28日投A ...
IEEE access投稿及注意事项(初稿，回复审稿人，终稿)
本博客是对自己 IEEE access 投稿从投稿到接收整个流程的记录.每个阶段可能遇到的问题都在本文中有说明,希望大家多多支持. 整体流程:投稿->收到审稿人回复->修改后重投-> ...
SCI投稿经验(三) 回复审稿人
个人觉得在投稿过程中,审稿人对文章的看法是非常重要的.而如何给审稿人留下好印象,就非常考验回复审稿人的技巧与方法了.因为既然文章已经送到审稿人手中,至少在编辑眼中暂时还是认可你的文章有在其期刊发表的潜 ...
如何正确回复审稿人：标准的Response to reviewer
在审稿意见回来之后,如何写一份标准的Response to reviewer!这篇Response to reviewer是投稿到International Journal of Pharmaceut ...
【SCI 投稿全过程英文信件模板（Cover letter、催稿信、修改稿Cover letter、修改稿回答审稿人的意见、询问校稿信件、文章校稿信件）】
SCI 投稿全过程信件模板一览一.最初投稿Cover letter 二.催稿信三.修改稿Cover letter 四.修改稿回答审稿人的意见(最重要的部分) 六.询问校稿信件(如果文章接受后时间较 ...
如何回复审稿人问题？
有的时候,你觉得审稿人问的都是××问题,比如,为什么不加这个技术的比较,为什么不考虑这个因素,最后来一句,请加上仿真和实验,如果能加后面就不用看了,但很多情况是,此时的你根本不想加(懂得都懂,写过论文 ...

如何回复审稿人的意见？（总结）

如何回复审稿人的意见？（总结）相关推荐

最新文章

热门文章