第24周SDAI缓解能否预测远期RA骨破坏受抑制

Hirano F, et al. EULAR 2015. Present ID:THU0085.

原文

译文

THU0085

SDAI REMISSION AT WEEK 24 IS A PREDICTOR OF GOOD FUNCTIONAL AND STRUCTURAL OUTCOMES AT WEEK 72 IN A T2T IMPLEMENTING COHORT

F. Hirano1,2,*, W. Yokoyama1,2, H. Yamazaki1,2, K. Amano3, Y. Kaneko4, A. Kawakami5, T. Matsui6, R. Sakai1, R. Koike1,2, N. Miyasaka2, M. Harigai1,2

1Department of Pharmacovigilance, 2Department of Rheumatology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, 3Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Kawagoe, 4Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, 5Unit of Translational Medicine, Department of Immunology and Rheumatology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, 6Department of Rheumatology, Sagamihara National Hospital, National Hospital Organization, Sagamihara, Japan

Background: In the treat-to-target strategy (T2T)1, simplified disease activity index (SDAI) has been proposed as one of measures to define remission2. Predictive ability of SDAI remission for functional and structural outcomes was shown by data from clinical trials, but has not been proven in a T2T implementing cohort.

Objectives: To examine if achieving SDAI remission is a predictor of good functional and structural outcomes in a T2T implementing cohort.

Methods: The T2T Epidemiological Study is a multi-centre, prospective cohort study, in which RA patients with moderate to high disease activity were enrolled and treated with T2T for 72 weeks. The disease activity was assessed every 12 weeks and the treatment was adjusted accordingly. Primary outcomes were HAQ and ∆mTSS at week 72. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to examine association between SDAI remission at week 24 and the two primary outcomes. Missing data were imputed using the multiple imputation method. Statistical significance levels were adjusted for multiple comparison using False Discovery Rate and BH methods.

Results: Of total 318 enrolled patients, 244 patients followed up for 72 weeks were analysed. Patient characteristics were as follows: female, 77%; mean age, 61; mean disease duration, 57 months. At week 24, 33% achieved SDAI remission. At week 72, 50% achieved SDAI remission, 61% achieved HAQ remission (≤0.5) and 73% showed ΔmTSSp=0.009], baseline HAQ [0.30 (0.19-0.47), p=2.4x10-7], absence of history of joint replacement related to RA [9.90 (1.57-62.5), p=0.015] and SDAI remission at week 24 [3.24 (1.57-6.71), p=0.0015]. Factors associated with ΔmTSSp=0.0037], serum MMP-3 level at week 24 [0.998(0.996-1.000), p=0.035] and SDAI remission at week 24 [3.21 (1.46-7.02), p=0.0036].

Conclusions: SDAI remission at week 24 is a significant predictor of good functional and structural outcomes at week 72 in the T2T implementing cohort.

References: 1. Ann Rheum Dis 2010;68:631-637. 2. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011;70:404-413.

Acknowledgements: We all thank all health care professionals and patients who participated in this study.

Disclosure of Interest: F. Hirano: None declared, W. Yokoyama: None declared, H. Yamazaki Grant/research support from: Abbvie Japan Co., Ltd., Astellas Pharma Inc., Bristol Myers Squibb K.K., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Eisai Co., Ltd., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Co., Ono Pharmaceuticals, Pfizer Japan Inc., Sanofi-Aventis KK., Santen Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Sekisui Medical Co., Ltd., Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Teijin Pharma Ltd., and UCB Japan, K. Amano Grant/research support from: Astellas, Chugai, Pfizer, Tanabe-Mitsubishi, Consultant for: Zenyaku Kogyo, Paid instructor for: Chugai, Pfizer, Santen, Tanabe-Mitsubishi, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Actellion, Astellas, Bristol-Myers-Squibb, Chugai, Diichi-Sankyo, Eisai, Pfizer, Tanabe-Mitsubishi, Y. Kaneko Consultant for: Abbvie, Paid instructor for: Eisai Pharmaceutical, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Astellas Pharmaceutical, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, Pfizer, Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Eisai Pharmaceutical, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Bristol Myers Squibb, Astellas Pharmaceutical, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, Pfizer, Janssen, UCB, A. Kawakami Grant/research support from: Abbvie GK, Eisai Co., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Co., Pfizer Japan, Janssen Pharmaceutical K. K., Takeda Pharmaceutical Company, Astellas Pharma Inc., Santen Pharmaceutical Co., Bristol-Myers Squibb, ONO Pharmaceutical Co., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Taisho Toyama Pharmaceutical Co., Speakers bureau: Abbvie GK, Eisai Co., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Co., Pfizer Japan, Janssen Pharmaceutical K. K., Takeda Pharmaceutical Company, Astellas Pharma Inc., Santen Pharmaceutical Co., Bristol-Myers Squibb, ONO Pharmaceutical Co., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Taisho Toyama Pharmaceutical Co., T. Matsui: None declared, R. Sakai Grant/research support from: Abbvie Japan Co., Ltd., Astellas Pharma Inc., Bristol Myers Squibb K.K., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Eisai Co., Ltd., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Co., Ono Pharmaceuticals, Pfizer Japan Inc., Sanofi-Aventis KK., Santen Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Sekisui Medical Co., Ltd., Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Teijin Pharma Ltd., and UCB Japan, R. Koike: None declared, N. Miyasaka Grant/research support from: Abbott Japan Co., Ltd., Astellas Pharma Inc., Bristol Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Dainihon-Sumitomo Pharma Co. Ltd., Daiichi-Sankyo Co. Ltd., Eisai Co. Ltd., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Co., Novartis Pharma K.K., Ltd., Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Teijin Pharma Ltd, Consultant for: Abbott Japan Co., Ltd., Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen Pharmaceutical KK, and Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., M. Harigai Grant/research support from: Abbvie Japan Co., Ltd., Astellas Pharma Inc., Bristol Myers Squibb K.K., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Eisai Co., Ltd., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Co., Ono Pharmaceuticals, Santen Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., and UCB Japan, Consultant for: Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Janssen Pharmaceutical KK, Teijin Pharma Ltd.

DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-eular.2103

背景: 在RA目标治疗策略(T2T)中[1], 简化的疾病活动指数(SDAI)已被提出作为临床缓解评判标准之一[2]。临床试验已经揭示SDAI缓解对关节功能和结构未来演变的预测能力, 但还没有在常规诊疗实践T2T的队列研究中得到证实。

目的: 探究获得SDAI缓解是否能预测T2T队列未来获得良好的关节功能和结构结局。

方法: T2T流行病学研究是一项多中心、前瞻性队列研究, 纳入中重度活动的RA患者, 按照T2T策略治疗72周。每12周评估疾病活动度, 并据之调整治疗。主要观察中的是治疗72周时的HAQ和ΔmTSS在。利用多变量逻辑回归分析检验第24周SDAI缓解与主要观察终点之间的相关性。使用多重插补法处理缺失数据。多重比较时应用错误发现率(False Discovery Rate)和BH方法校正统计学显著性水平。

结果: 共招募318名患者, 其中244例患者随访了72周并进行分析。患者特征如下, 女性77%, 平均年龄61岁, 平均病程57个月。第24周时SDAI缓解达标率为33%。第72周时, SDAI缓解达标率为50%, 61%达到HAQ缓解(HAQ≤0.5), 73%患者ΔmTSS<最小可检测变化(SDC)。与第72周时HAQ缓解显著相关的因子(比值比(95%CI)包括Steinbrocker分期为I期[2.35(1.23-4.46), P=0.009]、基线H​​AQ [0.30(0.19-0.47), P=2.4x10-7]、无RA相关关节置换史 [9.90(1.57-62.5), P=0.015]以及24周时达到SDAI临床缓解 [3.24(1.57-6.71), P=0.0015]。与ΔmTSS

结论: 对常规诊疗实践T2T策略的队列而言, 第24周获得SDAI缓是未来在第72周时获得关节功能和结构的良好结局的显著预测因子。

Table 1. Factors associated with HAQ≤0.5 at week 72

Variable

Odds Ratio (95%CI)

p value

(Intercept)

35.53 (7.21-175.01)

1.14E-5

Age

0.98 (0.96-1.00)

0.089

Steinbrocker's stage I (vs. stage II III IV)

2.35 (1.23-4.46)

0.009*

No history of joint replacement

9.90 (1.57-62.50)

0.015*

HAQ at enrollment

0.30 (0.19-0.47)

2.38E-7*

SDAI remission at week 24

3.24 (1.57-6.71)

0.0015*

Table 2. Factors associated with ΔmTSS

Variable

Odds Ratio (95%CI)

p value

(Intercept)

6.19 (3.25-11.81)

3.24E-8

Steinbrocker's stage I (vs. stage II III IV)

2.82 (1.40-5.65)

0.0037*

Number of DMARDs used before enrollement

0.79 (0.62-1.00)

0.054

Serum MMP-3 level at week 24

0.998 (0.996-1.000)

0.035*

SDAI remission at week 24

3.21 (1.46-7.02)

0.0036*

*The p value was statistically significant after correction for multiple comparison using FDR and BH methods.

表1. 与第72周HAQ≤0.5相关的因子

变量

比值比 (95%CI)

P

(截距)

35.53 (7.21-175.01)

1.14E-5

年龄

0.98 (0.96-1.00)

0.089

Steinbrocker分期为I (与分期II、 III和IV相比)

2.35 (1.23-4.46)

0.009*

无关节置换史

9.90 (1.57-62.50)

0.015*

招募时HAQ评分

0.30 (0.19-0.47)

2.38E-7*

第24周获得SDAI缓解

3.24 (1.57-6.71)

0.0015*

表2. 与第72周ΔmTSS

变量

比值比 (95%CI)

P

(截距)

6.19 (3.25-11.81)

3.24E-8

Steinbrocker分期为I (与分期II、 III和IV相比)

2.82 (1.40-5.65)

0.0037*

招募前使用过DMARDs的种类数

0.79 (0.62-1.00)

0.054

第24周MMP-3血清水平

0.998 (0.996-1.000)

0.035*

第24周获得SDAI缓解

3.21 (1.46-7.02)

0.0036*

*: 用FDR和BH方法校正的多重比较分析达到统计学显著意义的p值。

转载于:https://www.cnblogs.com/T2T4RD/p/5464165.html

第24周SDAI缓解能否预测远期RA骨破坏受抑制相关推荐

  1. settimeout需要清除吗_【期刊导读】新证据:HBsAg水平极低的非活动性HBsAg携带者经聚乙二醇干扰素治疗24周, HBsAg清除率高达83.3%...

    编者按:目前指南并没有推荐非活动性HBsAg携带者(IHC)进行抗病毒治疗,但在长期随访中发现有IHC仍存在一定的复发和肝癌风险,而获得HBsAg清除会将慢乙肝患者肝癌风险降至最低.因此许多IHC会有 ...

  2. 分享Kali Linux 2017年第24周镜像文件

     分享Kali Linux 2017年第24周镜像文件  Kali Linux官方于6月11日发布2017年的第24周镜像.这次维持了11个镜像文件的规模.默认的Gnome桌面的4个镜像,E17.KD ...

  3. MRI炎症和结构损伤指标对TNF拮抗剂治疗AS患者获持续缓解的预测价值

    MRI炎症和结构损伤指标对TNF拮抗剂治疗AS患者获持续缓解的预测价值 EULAR2015; PresentID: OP0043 PREDICTORS OF SUSTAINED REMISSION O ...

  4. 第6/24周 聚集索引

    上个星期我向你介绍了堆表(heap tables).我们说过,在SQL Server表可以是堆表(Heap Table)或者聚集表(Clustered Table)--一个在它上面有聚集索引(Clus ...

  5. 第24周维生素市场最新动态

    本周维生素市场稳定为主,价格坚挺的品种有B1.叶酸.其中B1市场略为活跃,叶酸厂家大幅提高报价后,询问增加,市场报价随之大幅上移.吉友联烟酰胺提价9%. VA:本周市场报价在185-200.VA-10 ...

  6. 深度学习基础24(实战:房价预测)

    实战:预测房价 此数据集由Bart de Cock于2011年收集 , 涵盖了2006-2010年期间亚利桑那州埃姆斯市的房价. 这个数据集是相当通用的,不会需要使用复杂模型架构. 下载和缓存数据集 ...

  7. 【阿旭机器学习实战】【24】信用卡用户流失预测实战

    [阿旭机器学习实战]系列文章主要介绍机器学习的各种算法模型及其实战案例,欢迎点赞,关注共同学习交流. 本文针对某国外匿名化处理后的信用卡真实数据集,通过建模判断该用户是否已经流失,包括特征处理与分类模 ...

  8. 【青少年编程(第24周)】Python-Turtle组队学习结营!

    2021年08月01日(周日)晚20:00我们在青少年编程竞赛交流群开展了第二十四次直播活动.我们直播活动的主要内容如下: 首先,我们奖励了上周测试超过60分的小朋友. 其次,讲解了上次测试中小朋友们 ...

  9. 第19/24周 锁升级(Lock Escalations)

    大家好,欢迎回到性能调优培训.上2个星期我们已经讨论了SQLServer里的悲观和乐观锁.今天我想谈下SQL Server里对于锁的一个特殊现象:所谓的锁升级(Lock Escalations).在我 ...

  10. 第21/24周 性能监控(PAL工具)

    大家好,欢迎来到性能调优培训的最后一个月.在过去的5个月里,我们谈了SQL Server的各种性能相关的话题,包括性能调优的技术和问题. 但当在你面前,SQL Server没有按你预想的运行时,你会怎 ...

最新文章

  1. python3 scrapy+Crontab部署过程
  2. Response.Redirect(),Server.Transfer(),Server.Execute()的区别与网站优化
  3. Latex \section 使用中文
  4. Spring MVC实现Spring Security,Spring Stomp websocket Jetty嵌入式运行
  5. 大学使用python 编辑器_[雪峰磁针石博客]2018 最佳python编辑器和IDE
  6. 计算机技术在办公自动化中的应用,计算机技术在办公自动化中的应用浅析.doc...
  7. js判断字符串包含某个字符_python str 字符串的逻辑判断用法
  8. 小程序开发学习(5)---实现天气预报小程序
  9. 板邓:wordpress自定义登录页面实现用户登录
  10. go 写文件_如何在 Ubuntu 20.04 上安装 Go
  11. python while循环if_初入python 用户输入,if,(while 循环)
  12. UVA455 - Periodic Strings(周期串)
  13. 富士相机设置传原图_富士XT4 多位摄影师试用体验报告
  14. 阿里P7跳槽后曝光薪资截图:新公司月入税后五万多,很满足!
  15. tensorflow输出
  16. 工作流任务的权限问题
  17. 【SpringMVC注解篇】SpringMVC 注解驱动开发(二)JSON数据交互相关注解
  18. 过滤文本中的中英文标点符号、字母、数字、表情
  19. “但行好事 莫问前程 只问耕耘 不问收获 成功不必在我 而功力必不唐捐” 科技袁人·年终盛典——5G是科技时代非常重要的基础设施...
  20. layui通过lay-submit lay-filter=“action“监听失败的处理

热门文章

  1. 解决adb devices无法连接夜神模拟器
  2. android webview设置和遇到的坑
  3. dell 7447加装SSD
  4. 移动端上拉加载下拉刷新插件-mescroll.js插件
  5. Linux netstat常用命令
  6. wampserver修改默认根目录
  7. windows消息处理机制和VB
  8. Java开发笔记(一百二十九)Swing的输入框
  9. kuangbin专题十二 基础DP1【从入门到熟练】【10题】
  10. 洛谷P3649 [APIO2014]回文串(回文自动机)