oracle没commit有日志吗,commit操作是否一定会被记录到redo等问题的研究
网上已有不少介绍与分析redolog dump的技术讨论，关于这部分基础知识可以参考网上内容。
本文的测试案例旨在回答以下几个问题：
DDL语句对应的更改在Redo里是以何种形式进行记录的？
merge命令产生的修改在Redo里是以何种形式进行记录的？
commit操作一定会被记录在redo里吗？
//
// redolog如何记载DDL语句所产生的修改
//
create table scott.t0107_1 tablespace test1 as select * from all_users where 1=2;
col member format a50
set linesize 100
select lf.member,l.status,l.sequence# from v$log l,v$logfile lf where l.group#=lf.group#;
MEMBER STATUS SEQUENCE#
-------------------------------------------------- ---------------- ----------
/odata/redo/ORA55/onlinelog/o1_mf_1_d4wdjm7w_.log CURRENT 52
/odata/redo/ORA55/onlinelog/o1_mf_2_d4wdjmmx_.log INACTIVE 50
/odata/redo/ORA55/onlinelog/o1_mf_3_d4wdjn3k_.log INACTIVE 51
select dbms_flashback.get_system_change_number() from dual;
DBMS_FLASHBACK.GET_SYSTEM_CHANGE_NUMBER()
-----------------------------------------
1878119
alter table scott.t0107_1 modify (username varchar2(31));
select dbms_flashback.get_system_change_number() from dual;
DBMS_FLASHBACK.GET_SYSTEM_CHANGE_NUMBER()
-----------------------------------------
1878126
select value from v$diag_info where name='Default Trace File';
VALUE
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
/oracle/app/oracle/diag/rdbms/ora55/ora55/trace/ora55_ora_29884476.trc
alter system dump logfile '/odata/redo/ORA55/onlinelog/o1_mf_1_d4wdjm7w_.log' scn MIN 1878119 scn MAX 1878126;
***ora55_ora_29884476.trc文件里摘录的相关内容，
REDO RECORD - Thread:1 RBA: 0x000034.000065a0.0010 LEN: 0x0100 VLD: 0x05
SCN: 0x0000.001ca868 SUBSCN: 1 12/19/2016 11:18:33
(LWN RBA: 0x000034.000065a0.0010 LEN: 0002 NST: 0001 SCN: 0x0000.001ca868)
CHANGE #1 TYP:0 CLS:35 AFN:3 DBA:0x00c00110 OBJ:4294967295 SCN:0x0000.001ca864 SEQ:1 OP:5.2 ENC:0 RBL:0
ktudh redo: slt: 0x0007 sqn: 0x000007e9 flg: 0x0011 siz: 80 fbi: 0
uba: 0x00c0026c.01d4.11 pxid: 0x0000.000.00000000
CHANGE #2 TYP:0 CLS:36 AFN:3 DBA:0x00c0026c OBJ:4294967295 SCN:0x0000.001ca862 SEQ:2 OP:5.1 ENC:0 RBL:0
ktudb redo: siz: 80 spc: 6286 flg: 0x0010 seq: 0x01d4 rec: 0x11
xid: 0x000a.007.000007e9
ktubl redo: slt: 7 rci: 0 opc: 5.7 [objn: 0 objd: 0 tsn: 0]
Undo type: Regular undo Begin trans Last buffer split: No
。。。。。
REDO RECORD - Thread:1 RBA: 0x000034.000065a0.0110 LEN: 0x0188 VLD: 0x01
SCN: 0x0000.001ca869 SUBSCN: 1 12/19/2016 11:18:33
CHANGE #1 MEDIA RECOVERY MARKER SCN:0x0000.00000000 SEQ:0 OP:24.1 ENC:0
REDO RECORD - Thread:1 RBA: 0x000034.000065a2.0010 LEN: 0x0390 VLD: 0x05
SCN: 0x0000.001ca86c SUBSCN: 1 12/19/2016 11:18:33
(LWN RBA: 0x000034.000065a2.0010 LEN: 0005 NST: 0001 SCN: 0x0000.001ca86a)
CHANGE #1 TYP:0 CLS:35 AFN:3 DBA:0x00c00110 OBJ:4294967295 SCN:0x0000.001ca868 SEQ:1 OP:5.2 ENC:0 RBL:0
ktudh redo: slt: 0x0007 sqn: 0x00000000 flg: 0x0002 siz: 356 fbi: 0
uba: 0x00c0026c.01d4.12 pxid: 0x0000.000.00000000
CHANGE #2 TYP:0 CLS:36 AFN:3 DBA:0x00c0026c OBJ:4294967295 SCN:0x0000.001ca868 SEQ:1 OP:5.1 ENC:0 RBL:0
ktudb redo: siz: 356 spc: 6204 flg: 0x0022 seq: 0x01d4 rec: 0x12
xid: 0x000a.007.000007e9
ktubu redo: slt: 7 rci: 0 opc: 11.1 objn: 4 objd: 2 tsn: 0
Undo type: Regular undo Undo type: Last buffer split: No
。。。。。
KDO Op code: URP row dependencies Disabled
。。。。。
CHANGE #3 TYP:2 CLS:1 AFN:1 DBA:0x00407b0d OBJ:2 SCN:0x0000.001ca864 SEQ:1 OP:11.5 ENC:0 RBL:0
KTB Redo
op: 0x11 ver: 0x01
compat bit: 4 (post-11) padding: 1
op: F xid: 0x000a.007.000007e9 uba: 0x00c0026c.01d4.12
Block cleanout record, scn: 0x0000.001ca86c ver: 0x01 opt: 0x02, entries follow...
itli: 2 flg: 2 scn: 0x0000.001ca864
KDO Op code: URP row dependencies Disabled
REDO RECORD - Thread:1 RBA: 0x000034.000065a3.01b0 LEN: 0x00d0 VLD: 0x01
SCN: 0x0000.001ca86c SUBSCN: 2 12/19/2016 11:18:33
CHANGE #1 TYP:0 CLS:36 AFN:3 DBA:0x00c0026c OBJ:4294967295 SCN:0x0000.001ca86c SEQ:1 OP:5.1 ENC:0 RBL:0
ktudb redo: siz: 68 spc: 5846 flg: 0x0022 seq: 0x01d4 rec: 0x13
xid: 0x000a.007.000007e9
ktubu redo: slt: 7 rci: 18 opc: 11.1 objn: 21 objd: 2 tsn: 0
Undo type: Regular undo Undo type: Last buffer split: No
。。。。。
KDO Op code: LKR row dependencies Disabled
。。。。。
CHANGE #2 TYP:0 CLS:1 AFN:1 DBA:0x00407b0d OBJ:2 SCN:0x0000.001ca86c SEQ:1 OP:11.4 ENC:0 RBL:0
KTB Redo
op: 0x02 ver: 0x01
compat bit: 4 (post-11) padding: 1
op: C uba: 0x00c0026c.01d4.13
KDO Op code: LKR row dependencies Disabled
。。。。。
REDO RECORD - Thread:1 RBA: 0x000034.000065a4.0090 LEN: 0x01e8 VLD: 0x01
SCN: 0x0000.001ca86c SUBSCN: 3 12/19/2016 11:18:33
CHANGE #1 TYP:0 CLS:36 AFN:3 DBA:0x00c0026c OBJ:4294967295 SCN:0x0000.001ca86c SEQ:2 OP:5.1 ENC:0 RBL:0
ktudb redo: siz: 208 spc: 5776 flg: 0x0022 seq: 0x01d4 rec: 0x14
xid: 0x000a.007.000007e9
ktubu redo: slt: 7 rci: 19 opc: 11.1 objn: 21 objd: 2 tsn: 0
Undo type: Regular undo Undo type: Last buffer split: No
Tablespace Undo: No
0x00000000
KDO undo record:
KTB Redo
op: 0x02 ver: 0x01
compat bit: 4 (post-11) padding: 1
op: C uba: 0x00c0026c.01d4.13
KDO Op code: URP row dependencies Disabled
。。。。。
CHANGE #2 TYP:0 CLS:1 AFN:1 DBA:0x00407b0d OBJ:2 SCN:0x0000.001ca86c SEQ:2 OP:11.5 ENC:0 RBL:0
KTB Redo
op: 0x02 ver: 0x01
compat bit: 4 (post-11) padding: 1
op: C uba: 0x00c0026c.01d4.14
KDO Op code: URP row dependencies Disabled
。。。。。
REDO RECORD - Thread:1 RBA: 0x000034.000065a5.0088 LEN: 0x01f0 VLD: 0x01
SCN: 0x0000.001ca86c SUBSCN: 4 12/19/2016 11:18:33
CHANGE #1 TYP:0 CLS:36 AFN:3 DBA:0x00c0026c OBJ:4294967295 SCN:0x0000.001ca86c SEQ:3 OP:5.1 ENC:0 RBL:0
ktudb redo: siz: 196 spc: 5566 flg: 0x0022 seq: 0x01d4 rec: 0x15
xid: 0x000a.007.000007e9
ktubu redo: slt: 7 rci: 20 opc: 11.1 objn: 18 objd: 18 tsn: 0
Undo type: Regular undo Undo type: Last buffer split: No
Tablespace Undo: No
0x00000000
KDO undo record:
KTB Redo
op: 0x04 ver: 0x01
compat bit: 4 (post-11) padding: 1
op: L itl: xid: 0x000a.010.000007e8 uba: 0x00c0026b.01d4.04
flg: C--- lkc: 0 scn: 0x0000.001ca864
KDO Op code: URP row dependencies Disabled
。。。。。
CHANGE #2 TYP:2 CLS:1 AFN:1 DBA:0x00405a22 OBJ:18 SCN:0x0000.001ca864 SEQ:1 OP:11.5 ENC:0 RBL:0
KTB Redo
op: 0x11 ver: 0x01
compat bit: 4 (post-11) padding: 1
op: F xid: 0x000a.007.000007e9 uba: 0x00c0026c.01d4.15
Block cleanout record, scn: 0x0000.001ca86c ver: 0x01 opt: 0x02, entries follow...
itli: 1 flg: 2 scn: 0x0000.001ca864
KDO Op code: URP row dependencies Disabled
REDO RECORD - Thread:1 RBA: 0x000034.000065a6.0088 LEN: 0x00b0 VLD: 0x01
SCN: 0x0000.001ca86d SUBSCN: 1 12/19/2016 11:18:33
CHANGE #1 TYP:0 CLS:35 AFN:3 DBA:0x00c00110 OBJ:4294967295 SCN:0x0000.001ca86c SEQ:1 OP:5.4 ENC:0 RBL:0
ktucm redo: slt: 0x0007 sqn: 0x000007e9 srt: 0 sta: 9 flg: 0x2 ktucf redo: uba: 0x00c0026c.01d4.15 ext: 2 spc: 5368 fbi: 0
CHANGE #2 MEDIA RECOVERY MARKER SCN:0x0000.00000000 SEQ:0 OP:17.28 ENC:0
STANDBY METADATA CACHE INVALIDATION
KQR INFO:
[f06d0a44, 8, 14369]
KGL INFO:
[db6d4360.141d8603.b334057c.60f21170, 1]
[db6d4360.141d8603.b334057c.60f21170, 1]
END OF REDO DUMP
执行了alter table scott.t0107_1 modify (username varchar2(31))之后会对TAB$、COL$、OBJ$三个系统表进行操作，这三个表的data_object_id分别为2、2、18，object_id分别为4、21、18，在undo block的redo里会显示object_id和data_object_id，在data block的undo里只会显示data_object_id，redolog里并不会显式的记录DDL语句
//
// 测试redolog如何记录MERGE语句所产生的修改
//
drop table scott.t0108_1;
drop table scott.t0108_2;
create table scott.t0108_1 (id1 number,col1 varchar2(1)) tablespace test1;
create table scott.t0108_2 (id2 number,col2 varchar2(1)) tablespace test1;
insert into scott.t0108_1 values(1,'A');
insert into scott.t0108_1 values(2,'B');
insert into scott.t0108_1 values(3,'C');
commit;
insert into scott.t0108_2 values(1,'a');
insert into scott.t0108_2 values(3,'c');
insert into scott.t0108_2 values(5,'E');
commit;
select * from scott.t0108_1;
ID1 C
---------- -
1 A
2 B
3 C
select * from scott.t0108_2;
ID2 C
---------- -
1 a
3 c
5 E
select dbms_rowid.rowid_block_number(rowid),dbms_rowid.rowid_relative_fno(rowid) from scott.t0108_1;
DBMS_ROWID.ROWID_BLOCK_NUMBER(ROWID) DBMS_ROWID.ROWID_RELATIVE_FNO(ROWID)
------------------------------------ ------------------------------------
271 4
271 4
271 4
col member format a50
set linesize 100
select lf.member,l.status,l.sequence# from v$log l,v$logfile lf where l.group#=lf.group#;
MEMBER STATUS SEQUENCE#
-------------------------------------------------- ---------------- ----------
/odata/redo/ORA55/onlinelog/o1_mf_1_d4wdjm7w_.log INACTIVE 43
/odata/redo/ORA55/onlinelog/o1_mf_2_d4wdjmmx_.log CURRENT 44
/odata/redo/ORA55/onlinelog/o1_mf_3_d4wdjn3k_.log INACTIVE 42
alter system switch logfile;
select lf.member,l.status,l.sequence# from v$log l,v$logfile lf where l.group#=lf.group#;
MEMBER STATUS SEQUENCE#
-------------------------------------------------- ---------------- ----------
/odata/redo/ORA55/onlinelog/o1_mf_1_d4wdjm7w_.log INACTIVE 43
/odata/redo/ORA55/onlinelog/o1_mf_2_d4wdjmmx_.log ACTIVE 44
/odata/redo/ORA55/onlinelog/o1_mf_3_d4wdjn3k_.log CURRENT 45
merge into scott.t0108_1 t1 using scott.t0108_2 t2 on (t1.id1=t2.id2) when matched then update set col1=col2 delete where col1='a' when not matched then insert (id1,col1) values(id2,col2);
commit;
SQL> select * from scott.t0108_1;
ID1 C
---------- -
2 B
3 c
5 E
select value from v$diag_info where name='Default Trace File';
VALUE
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
/oracle/app/oracle/diag/rdbms/ora55/ora55/trace/ora55_ora_33226830.trc
SQL> select dbms_rowid.rowid_block_number(rowid),dbms_rowid.rowid_relative_fno(rowid) from scott.t0108_1;
DBMS_ROWID.ROWID_BLOCK_NUMBER(ROWID) DBMS_ROWID.ROWID_RELATIVE_FNO(ROWID)
------------------------------------ ------------------------------------
271 4
271 4
271 4
alter system dump logfile '/odata/redo/ORA55/onlinelog/o1_mf_3_d4wdjn3k_.log' dba min 4 271 dba max 4 271;
***ora55_ora_33226830.trc文件内容
>>> redo record由此处开始，先是record头信息
REDO RECORD - Thread:1 RBA: 0x00002d.00000002.0010 LEN: 0x0518 VLD: 0x0d
SCN: 0x0000.0017f1d4 SUBSCN: 1 12/12/2016 12:11:41
(LWN RBA: 0x00002d.00000002.0010 LEN: 0003 NST: 0001 SCN: 0x0000.0017f1d3)
>>> OP:11.4 lock row操作，具体就是更新block 4/271里某一行的lb栏位
CHANGE #1 TYP:2 CLS:1 AFN:4 DBA:0x0100010f OBJ:13780 SCN:0x0000.0017f148 SEQ:1 OP:11.4 ENC:0 RBL:0
KTB Redo
op: 0x11 ver: 0x01
compat bit: 4 (post-11) padding: 1
op: F xid: 0x000a.004.000004b6 uba: 0x00c04f83.00ed.39
Block cleanout record, scn: 0x0000.0017f1cd ver: 0x01 opt: 0x02, entries follow...
itli: 1 flg: 2 scn: 0x0000.0017f148
KDO Op code: LKR row dependencies Disabled
xtype: XA flags: 0x00000000 bdba: 0x0100010f hdba: 0x0100010a
itli: 2 ispac: 0 maxfr: 4858
tabn: 0 slot: 0 to: 2
delete t0108_1 where dbms_rowid.rowid_row_number(rowid)=1执行前给4/271里的第一行，也就是id1=1所在行上锁的操作
>>> OP:5.2 更新undo header
CHANGE #2 TYP:0 CLS:35 AFN:3 DBA:0x00c00110 OBJ:4294967295 SCN:0x0000.0017f18a SEQ:1 OP:5.2 ENC:0 RBL:0
ktudh redo: slt: 0x0004 sqn: 0x000004b6 flg: 0x0012 siz: 112 fbi: 0
uba: 0x00c04f83.00ed.39 pxid: 0x0000.000.00000000
>>> OP:11.3 删除记录
CHANGE #3 TYP:0 CLS:1 AFN:4 DBA:0x0100010f OBJ:13780 SCN:0x0000.0017f1d4 SEQ:1 OP:11.3 ENC:0 RBL:0
KTB Redo
op: 0x02 ver: 0x01
compat bit: 4 (post-11) padding: 1
op: C uba: 0x00c04f83.00ed.3a
KDO Op code: DRP row dependencies Disabled
xtype: XA flags: 0x00000000 bdba: 0x0100010f hdba: 0x0100010a
itli: 2 ispac: 0 maxfr: 4858
tabn: 0 slot: 0(0x0)
记录delete t0108_1 where id1=1的操作
>>> OP:11.4 lock row操作，具体就是更新block 4/271里的lb位
CHANGE #4 TYP:0 CLS:1 AFN:4 DBA:0x0100010f OBJ:13780 SCN:0x0000.0017f1d4 SEQ:2 OP:11.4 ENC:0 RBL:0
KTB Redo
op: 0x02 ver: 0x01
compat bit: 4 (post-11) padding: 1
op: C uba: 0x00c04f83.00ed.3b
KDO Op code: LKR row dependencies Disabled
xtype: XA flags: 0x00000000 bdba: 0x0100010f hdba: 0x0100010a
itli: 2 ispac: 0 maxfr: 4858
tabn: 0 slot: 2 to: 2
update t0108_1 set col1='c' where id1=3前给id1=3所在行上锁的操作
>>> OP:11.5 update row操作
CHANGE #5 TYP:0 CLS:1 AFN:4 DBA:0x0100010f OBJ:13780 SCN:0x0000.0017f1d4 SEQ:3 OP:11.5 ENC:0 RBL:0
KTB Redo
op: 0x02 ver: 0x01
compat bit: 4 (post-11) padding: 1
op: C uba: 0x00c04f83.00ed.3c
KDO Op code: URP row dependencies Disabled
xtype: XAxtype KDO_KDOM2 flags: 0x00000080 bdba: 0x0100010f hdba: 0x0100010a
itli: 2 ispac: 0 maxfr: 4858
tabn: 0 slot: 2(0x2) flag: 0x2c lock: 2 ckix: 0
ncol: 2 nnew: 1 size: 0
Vector content:
col 1: [ 1] 63
记录update t0108_1 set col1='c' where id1=3操作所涉及的行以及更新后的字段值
>>> OP:11.11 一次插入大于等于一行的操作
CHANGE #6 TYP:0 CLS:1 AFN:4 DBA:0x0100010f OBJ:13780 SCN:0x0000.0017f1d4 SEQ:4 OP:11.11 ENC:0 RBL:0
KTB Redo
op: 0x02 ver: 0x01
compat bit: 4 (post-11) padding: 1
op: C uba: 0x00c04f83.00ed.3d
KDO Op code: QMI row dependencies Disabled
xtype: XA flags: 0x00000000 bdba: 0x0100010f hdba: 0x0100010a
itli: 2 ispac: 0 maxfr: 4858
tabn: 0 lock: 2 nrow: 1
slot[0]: 3
tl: 8 fb: --H-FL-- lb: 0x0 cc: 2
col 0: [ 2] c1 06
col 1: [ 1] 45
记录insert into t0108_1 values(5,'E')的操作
>>> OP:5.4 commit操作
CHANGE #7 TYP:0 CLS:35 AFN:3 DBA:0x00c00110 OBJ:4294967295 SCN:0x0000.0017f1d4 SEQ:1 OP:5.4 ENC:0 RBL:0
ktucm redo: slt: 0x0004 sqn: 0x000004b6 srt: 0 sta: 9 flg: 0x0
>>> OP:5.1 保存修改前映像至undo的操作
CHANGE #8 TYP:0 CLS:36 AFN:3 DBA:0x00c04f83 OBJ:4294967295 SCN:0x0000.0017f188 SEQ:2 OP:5.1 ENC:0 RBL:0
ktudb redo: siz: 112 spc: 606 flg: 0x0012 seq: 0x00ed rec: 0x39
xid: 0x000a.004.000004b6
ktubl redo: slt: 4 rci: 0 opc: 11.1 [objn: 13780 objd: 13780 tsn: 4]
Undo type: Regular undo Begin trans Last buffer split: No
Temp Object: No
Tablespace Undo: No
0x00000000 prev ctl uba: 0x00c04f83.00ed.37
prev ctl max cmt scn: 0x0000.00159fbb prev tx cmt scn: 0x0000.00178877
txn start scn: 0x0000.0017f152 logon user: 0 prev brb: 12603268 prev bcl: 0 BuExt idx: 0 flg2: 0
KDO undo record:
KTB Redo
op: 0x03 ver: 0x01
compat bit: 4 (post-11) padding: 1
op: Z
KDO Op code: LKR row dependencies Disabled
xtype: XA flags: 0x00000000 bdba: 0x0100010f hdba: 0x0100010a
itli: 2 ispac: 0 maxfr: 4858
tabn: 0 slot: 0 to: 0
把第一行的lb栏位置为0的操作，是CHANGE #1的逆操作
>>> OP:5.1 保存修改前映像至undo的操作
CHANGE #9 TYP:0 CLS:36 AFN:3 DBA:0x00c04f83 OBJ:4294967295 SCN:0x0000.0017f1d4 SEQ:1 OP:5.1 ENC:0 RBL:0
ktudb redo: siz: 112 spc: 492 flg: 0x0022 seq: 0x00ed rec: 0x3a
xid: 0x000a.004.000004b6
ktubu redo: slt: 4 rci: 57 opc: 11.1 objn: 13780 objd: 13780 tsn: 4
Undo type: Regular undo Undo type: Last buffer split: No
Tablespace Undo: No
0x00000000
KDO undo record:
KTB Redo
op: 0x02 ver: 0x01
compat bit: 4 (post-11) padding: 1
op: C uba: 0x00c04f83.00ed.39
KDO Op code: IRP row dependencies Disabled
xtype: XA flags: 0x00000000 bdba: 0x0100010f hdba: 0x0100010a
itli: 2 ispac: 0 maxfr: 4858
tabn: 0 slot: 0(0x0) size/delt: 8
fb: --H-FL-- lb: 0x2 cc: 2
null: --
col 0: [ 2] c1 02
col 1: [ 1] 41
对应insert into t0108_1 values(1,'A')操作，是CHANGE #3的逆操作
>>> OP:5.1 保存修改前映像至undo的操作
CHANGE #10 TYP:0 CLS:36 AFN:3 DBA:0x00c04f83 OBJ:4294967295 SCN:0x0000.0017f1d4 SEQ:2 OP:5.1 ENC:0 RBL:0
ktudb redo: siz: 68 spc: 378 flg: 0x0022 seq: 0x00ed rec: 0x3b
xid: 0x000a.004.000004b6
ktubu redo: slt: 4 rci: 58 opc: 11.1 objn: 13780 objd: 13780 tsn: 4
Undo type: Regular undo Undo type: Last buffer split: No
Tablespace Undo: No
0x00000000
KDO undo record:
KTB Redo
op: 0x02 ver: 0x01
compat bit: 4 (post-11) padding: 1
op: C uba: 0x00c04f83.00ed.3a
KDO Op code: LKR row dependencies Disabled
xtype: XA flags: 0x00000000 bdba: 0x0100010f hdba: 0x0100010a
itli: 2 ispac: 0 maxfr: 4858
tabn: 0 slot: 2 to: 0
把第三行的lb栏位置为0的操作，是CHANGE #4的逆操作
>>> OP:5.1 保存修改前映像至undo的操作
CHANGE #11 TYP:0 CLS:36 AFN:3 DBA:0x00c04f83 OBJ:4294967295 SCN:0x0000.0017f1d4 SEQ:3 OP:5.1 ENC:0 RBL:0
ktudb redo: siz: 88 spc: 308 flg: 0x0022 seq: 0x00ed rec: 0x3c
xid: 0x000a.004.000004b6
ktubu redo: slt: 4 rci: 59 opc: 11.1 objn: 13780 objd: 13780 tsn: 4
Undo type: Regular undo Undo type: Last buffer split: No
Tablespace Undo: No
0x00000000
KDO undo record:
KTB Redo
op: 0x02 ver: 0x01
compat bit: 4 (post-11) padding: 1
op: C uba: 0x00c04f83.00ed.3b
KDO Op code: URP row dependencies Disabled
xtype: XAxtype KDO_KDOM2 flags: 0x00000080 bdba: 0x0100010f hdba: 0x0100010a
itli: 2 ispac: 0 maxfr: 4858
tabn: 0 slot: 2(0x2) flag: 0x2c lock: 2 ckix: 0
ncol: 2 nnew: 1 size: 0
Vector content:
col 1: [ 1] 43
对应的update t0108_1 set col1='C' where id1=3操作，是CHANGE #5的逆操作
>>> OP:5.1 保存修改前映像至undo的操作
CHANGE #12 TYP:0 CLS:36 AFN:3 DBA:0x00c04f83 OBJ:4294967295 SCN:0x0000.0017f1d4 SEQ:4 OP:5.1 ENC:0 RBL:0
ktudb redo: siz: 72 spc: 218 flg: 0x0022 seq: 0x00ed rec: 0x3d
xid: 0x000a.004.000004b6
ktubu redo: slt: 4 rci: 60 opc: 11.1 objn: 13780 objd: 13780 tsn: 4
Undo type: Regular undo Undo type: Last buffer split: No
Tablespace Undo: No
0x00000000
KDO undo record:
KTB Redo
op: 0x02 ver: 0x01
compat bit: 4 (post-11) padding: 1
op: C uba: 0x00c04f83.00ed.3c
KDO Op code: QMD row dependencies Disabled
xtype: XA flags: 0x00000000 bdba: 0x0100010f hdba: 0x0100010a
itli: 2 ispac: 0 maxfr: 4858
tabn: 0 lock: 0 nrow: 1
slot[0]: 3
对应delete scott.t0108_1 where id1=5这一操作，是CHANGE #6的逆操作
>>> 以下部分是block written record
REDO RECORD - Thread:1 RBA: 0x00002d.00000006.01b0 LEN: 0x0134 VLD: 0x02
SCN: 0x0000.0017f1e1 SUBSCN: 1 12/12/2016 12:12:16
(LWN RBA: 0x00002d.00000006.0010 LEN: 0005 NST: 0001 SCN: 0x0000.0017f1e1)
CHANGE #1 MEDIA RECOVERY MARKER SCN:0x0000.00000000 SEQ:0 OP:23.1 ENC:0
Block Written - afn: 4 rdba: 0x01000108 BFT:(1024,16777480) non-BFT:(4,264)
scn: 0x0000.0017f146 seq: 0x02 flg:0x04
Block Written - afn: 4 rdba: 0x01000109 BFT:(1024,16777481) non-BFT:(4,265)
scn: 0x0000.0017f13f seq: 0x02 flg:0x04
Block Written - afn: 4 rdba: 0x0100010a BFT:(1024,16777482) non-BFT:(4,266)
scn: 0x0000.0017f146 seq: 0x03 flg:0x04
Block Written - afn: 4 rdba: 0x0100010b BFT:(1024,16777483) non-BFT:(4,267)
scn: 0x0000.0017f146 seq: 0x02 flg:0x04
Block Written - afn: 4 rdba: 0x0100010c BFT:(1024,16777484) non-BFT:(4,268)
scn: 0x0000.0017f146 seq: 0x02 flg:0x04
Block Written - afn: 4 rdba: 0x0100010d BFT:(1024,16777485) non-BFT:(4,269)
scn: 0x0000.0017f146 seq: 0x02 flg:0x04
Block Written - afn: 4 rdba: 0x0100010e BFT:(1024,16777486) non-BFT:(4,270)
scn: 0x0000.0017f146 seq: 0x02 flg:0x04
Block Written - afn: 4 rdba: 0x0100010f BFT:(1024,16777487) non-BFT:(4,271)
scn: 0x0000.0017f1d4 seq: 0x06 flg:0x06
Block Written - afn: 4 rdba: 0x01000110 BFT:(1024,16777488) non-BFT:(4,272)
scn: 0x0000.0017f150 seq: 0x02 flg:0x04
Block Written - afn: 4 rdba: 0x01000111 BFT:(1024,16777489) non-BFT:(4,273)
scn: 0x0000.0017f149 seq: 0x02 flg:0x04
Block Written - afn: 4 rdba: 0x01000112 BFT:(1024,16777490) non-BFT:(4,274)
scn: 0x0000.0017f150 seq: 0x03 flg:0x04
Block Written - afn: 4 rdba: 0x01000113 BFT:(1024,16777491) non-BFT:(4,275)
scn: 0x0000.0017f150 seq: 0x02 flg:0x04
Block Written - afn: 4 rdba: 0x01000114 BFT:(1024,16777492) non-BFT:(4,276)
scn: 0x0000.0017f150 seq: 0x02 flg:0x04
Block Written - afn: 4 rdba: 0x01000115 BFT:(1024,16777493) non-BFT:(4,277)
scn: 0x0000.0017f150 seq: 0x02 flg:0x04
Block Written - afn: 4 rdba: 0x01000116 BFT:(1024,16777494) non-BFT:(4,278)
scn: 0x0000.0017f150 seq: 0x02 flg:0x04
Block Written - afn: 4 rdba: 0x01000117 BFT:(1024,16777495) non-BFT:(4,279)
scn: 0x0000.0017f152 seq: 0x01 flg:0x06
END OF REDO DUMP
用OP：23.1表示Dummy block written callback的操作，block written record主要是DBWR在完成数据块从内存写入到磁盘的操作后，通知LGWR记录下这写block及其写入时刻对应的SCN，可用于避免实例恢复情况下对已经发生checkpoint的data block再次运用Redo的重复劳动，比如:
T0时刻：用户对block A的第1行记录进行了update操作，这是对应的RBA是：100.2.11
T1时刻：用户对block B的第1行记录进行了update操作，这是对应的RBA是：100.3.20
T2时刻：用户对block C的第1行记录进行了update操作，这是对应的RBA是：100.3.50
T3时刻：用户对block A的第2行记录进行了update操作，这是对应的RBA是：100.4.14
T4时刻：用户对block D的第1行记录进行了update操作，这是对应的RBA是：100.5.15
这时候checkpoint queue里的脏块按照修改的先后顺序有
block A
T5时刻：发生了增量检查点，DBWR将checkpoint queue中的脏块A、B写入磁盘(注意这时block A里的第1、2行记录更新后的值都已经存入了磁盘，block A和block B都已经不是脏块了)，DBWR在写脏块时通知LGWR在redo日志里同步更新block A、block B的block written record信息，其中就包括了写入时的scn，controlfile里的LRBA值会随着写脏块的动作前移到RBA:100.3.50，若此时实例发生crash，恢复的起点虽然是RBA:100.3.50，但RBA:100.4.14对应的redo改变向量里记录的block A的scn值小于等于block written record中的scn，所以RBA:100.4.14不会被重复应用在block A上
Merge操作所生成的redolog内容分析，Merge的功能本质上是由两表关联后通过update、insert、delete三种DML操作及它们的组合效果所实现的。本例中merge into scott.t0108_1 t1 using scott.t0108_2 t2 on (t1.id1=t2.id2) when matched then update set col1=col2 delete where col1='a' when not matched then insert (id1,col1) values(id2,col2)可分解为如下四个步骤：
(1)update t0108_1 set col1='a' where id1=1;
(2)update t0108_1 set col1='c' where id1=3;
(3)delete t0108_1 where col1='a';
(4)insert into t0108_1 values(5,'E');
在解析redolog时我们不难看出oracle将(1)和(3)两个步骤进行了融合，融合的结果是删除了id1=1这条记录，所以从redolog里我们看到的最终顺序是(3)->(2)->(4)。
知识扩展：大家可能注意到上面的dump结果中每一条redo change vector都有一个SEQ值，且称其为改变序列号，这个序列号有时是接着上一个值继续增大，有时又会从1开始重新编号，是连续编号还是重新编号取决于：
1、是否在一个逻辑操作中；2、与上一条redo变化矢量的block类型是否相同，data block与undo block就属于不同类型的block；3、是用户级数据的修改还是元数据的修改，诸如修改lb栏位的操作就属于元数据的修改。只有这三个条件都满足，SEQ才会连续进行编号
//
// commit与不commit的情况下对于insert语句记入Redo的内容有何差异
//
>>>>> insert后不commit
drop table scott.t0115_2;
create table scott.t0115_2 (id number,col2 varchar2(1)) tablespace test1;
alter system switch logfile;
col member format a50
set linesize 100
select lf.member,l.status,l.sequence# from v$log l,v$logfile lf where l.group#=lf.group#;
MEMBER STATUS SEQUENCE#
-------------------------------------------------- ---------------- ----------
/odata/redo/ORA55/onlinelog/o1_mf_1_d4wdjm7w_.log CURRENT 55
/odata/redo/ORA55/onlinelog/o1_mf_2_d4wdjmmx_.log ACTIVE 53
/odata/redo/ORA55/onlinelog/o1_mf_3_d4wdjn3k_.log ACTIVE 54
insert into scott.t0115_2 values(1,'A');
select dbms_rowid.rowid_block_number(rowid),dbms_rowid.rowid_relative_fno(rowid) from scott.t0115_2;
DBMS_ROWID.ROWID_BLOCK_NUMBER( DBMS_ROWID.ROWID_RELATIVE_FNO(
------------------------------ ------------------------------
331 4
select value from v$diag_info where name='Default Trace File';
VALUE
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
/oracle/app/oracle/diag/rdbms/ora55/ora55/trace/ora55_ora_33226834.trc
alter system dump logfile '/odata/redo/ORA55/onlinelog/o1_mf_1_d4wdjm7w_.log' dba min 4 331 dba max 4 331;
***ora55_ora_33226834.trc文件内容
REDO RECORD - Thread:1 RBA: 0x000037.0000000d.00b4 LEN: 0x005c VLD: 0x01
SCN: 0x0000.001cc020 SUBSCN: 2 12/19/2016 15:25:20
(LWN RBA: 0x000037.0000000c.0010 LEN: 0003 NST: 0001 SCN: 0x0000.001cc01f)
CHANGE #1 TYP:1 CLS:1 AFN:4 DBA:0x0100014b OBJ:14373 SCN:0x0000.001cc020 SEQ:1 OP:13.21 ENC:0 RBL:0
ktspbfredo - Format Pagetable Datablock
Parent(l1) DBA: 0x01000148 typ: 1 objd: 14373 itls: 2 fmt_flag: 0 poff: 0
cscn: 0x0000.001cc020 inc#:0
REDO RECORD - Thread:1 RBA: 0x000037.0000000f.016c LEN: 0x016c VLD: 0x01
SCN: 0x0000.001cc021 SUBSCN: 1 12/19/2016 15:25:25
(LWN RBA: 0x000037.0000000f.0010 LEN: 0002 NST: 0001 SCN: 0x0000.001cc021)
CHANGE #1 TYP:0 CLS:35 AFN:3 DBA:0x00c00110 OBJ:4294967295 SCN:0x0000.001cc020 SEQ:1 OP:5.2 ENC:0 RBL:0
ktudh redo: slt: 0x000e sqn: 0x000007f7 flg: 0x0012 siz: 112 fbi: 0
uba: 0x00c00251.01d8.04 pxid: 0x0000.000.00000000
CHANGE #2 TYP:0 CLS:36 AFN:3 DBA:0x00c00251 OBJ:4294967295 SCN:0x0000.001cc01f SEQ:1 OP:5.1 ENC:0 RBL:0
ktudb redo: siz: 112 spc: 7828 flg: 0x0012 seq: 0x01d8 rec: 0x04
xid: 0x000a.00e.000007f7
ktubl redo: slt: 14 rci: 0 opc: 11.1 [objn: 14373 objd: 14373 tsn: 4]
Undo type: Regular undo Begin trans Last buffer split: No
Temp Object: No
Tablespace Undo: No
0x00000000 prev ctl uba: 0x00c00251.01d8.03
prev ctl max cmt scn: 0x0000.001cbea7 prev tx cmt scn: 0x0000.001cbea8
txn start scn: 0xffff.ffffffff logon user: 0 prev brb: 12583504 prev bcl: 0 BuExt idx: 0 flg2: 0
KDO undo record:
KTB Redo
op: 0x03 ver: 0x01
compat bit: 4 (post-11) padding: 1
op: Z
KDO Op code: DRP row dependencies Disabled
xtype: XA flags: 0x00000000 bdba: 0x0100014b hdba: 0x0100014a
itli: 1 ispac: 0 maxfr: 4858
tabn: 0 slot: 0(0x0)
CHANGE #3 TYP:0 CLS:1 AFN:4 DBA:0x0100014b OBJ:14373 SCN:0x0000.001cc020 SEQ:2 OP:11.2 ENC:0 RBL:0
KTB Redo
op: 0x01 ver: 0x01
compat bit: 4 (post-11) padding: 1
op: F xid: 0x000a.00e.000007f7 uba: 0x00c00251.01d8.04
KDO Op code: IRP row dependencies Disabled
xtype: XA flags: 0x00000000 bdba: 0x0100014b hdba: 0x0100014a
itli: 1 ispac: 0 maxfr: 4858
tabn: 0 slot: 0(0x0) size/delt: 8
fb: --H-FL-- lb: 0x1 cc: 2
null: --
col 0: [ 2] c1 02
col 1: [ 1] 41
记录内容及顺序：13.21(format new block)->5.2(更新undo header事务表)->5.1(前映像写入undo block)->11.2(insert)
如果之后再执行一次不带commit的insert
SQL> alter system switch logfile;
System altered.
col member format a50
set linesize 100
select lf.member,l.status,l.sequence# from v$log l,v$logfile lf where l.group#=lf.group#;
MEMBER STATUS SEQUENCE#
-------------------------------------------------- ---------------- ----------
/odata/redo/ORA55/onlinelog/o1_mf_1_d4wdjm7w_.log INACTIVE 64
/odata/redo/ORA55/onlinelog/o1_mf_2_d4wdjmmx_.log INACTIVE 65
/odata/redo/ORA55/onlinelog/o1_mf_3_d4wdjn3k_.log CURRENT 66
SQL> insert into scott.t0115_2 values(3,'C');
1 row created.
SQL> select dbms_rowid.rowid_block_number(rowid),dbms_rowid.rowid_relative_fno(rowid) from scott.t0115_2;
DBMS_ROWID.ROWID_BLOCK_NUMBER(ROWID) DBMS_ROWID.ROWID_RELATIVE_FNO(ROWID)
------------------------------------ ------------------------------------
12651 4
12651 4
12653 4
select value from v$diag_info where name='Default Trace File';
VALUE
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
/oracle/app/oracle/diag/rdbms/ora55/ora55/trace/ora55_ora_15925408.trc
SQL> alter system dump logfile '/odata/redo/ORA55/onlinelog/o1_mf_3_d4wdjn3k_.log' dba min 4 12653 dba max 4 12653;
System altered.
生成的redo日志ora55_ora_15925408.trc内容如下：
REDO RECORD - Thread:1 RBA: 0x000042.00000015.0010 LEN: 0x0198 VLD: 0x0d
SCN: 0x0000.001ce329 SUBSCN: 1 12/19/2016 21:20:56
(LWN RBA: 0x000042.00000015.0010 LEN: 0002 NST: 0001 SCN: 0x0000.001ce329)
CHANGE #1 TYP:0 CLS:1 AFN:4 DBA:0x0100316d OBJ:14378 SCN:0x0000.001ce0ab SEQ:2 OP:11.2 ENC:0 RBL:0
KTB Redo
op: 0x01 ver: 0x01
compat bit: 4 (post-11) padding: 1
op: F xid: 0x000a.00f.00000807 uba: 0x00c00202.01e0.05
KDO Op code: IRP row dependencies Disabled
xtype: XA flags: 0x00000000 bdba: 0x0100316d hdba: 0x0100316a
itli: 1 ispac: 0 maxfr: 4858
tabn: 0 slot: 0(0x0) size/delt: 8
fb: --H-FL-- lb: 0x1 cc: 2
null: --
col 0: [ 2] c1 04
col 1: [ 1] 43
CHANGE #2 TYP:0 CLS:35 AFN:3 DBA:0x00c00110 OBJ:4294967295 SCN:0x0000.001ce1eb SEQ:1 OP:5.2 ENC:0 RBL:0
ktudh redo: slt: 0x000f sqn: 0x00000807 flg: 0x0012 siz: 112 fbi: 0
uba: 0x00c00202.01e0.05 pxid: 0x0000.000.00000000
CHANGE #3 TYP:0 CLS:36 AFN:3 DBA:0x00c00202 OBJ:4294967295 SCN:0x0000.001ce1ea SEQ:1 OP:5.1 ENC:0 RBL:0
ktudb redo: siz: 112 spc: 7606 flg: 0x0012 seq: 0x01e0 rec: 0x05
xid: 0x000a.00f.00000807
ktubl redo: slt: 15 rci: 0 opc: 11.1 [objn: 14378 objd: 14378 tsn: 4]
Undo type: Regular undo Begin trans Last buffer split: No
Temp Object: No
Tablespace Undo: No
0x00000000 prev ctl uba: 0x00c00202.01e0.03
prev ctl max cmt scn: 0x0000.001ce1a8 prev tx cmt scn: 0x0000.001ce1a9
txn start scn: 0x0000.001ce2bf logon user: 0 prev brb: 12583425 prev bcl: 0 BuExt idx: 0 flg2: 0
KDO undo record:
KTB Redo
op: 0x03 ver: 0x01
compat bit: 4 (post-11) padding: 1
op: Z
KDO Op code: DRP row dependencies Disabled
xtype: XA flags: 0x00000000 bdba: 0x0100316d hdba: 0x0100316a
itli: 1 ispac: 0 maxfr: 4858
tabn: 0 slot: 0(0x0)
记录内容及顺序与之前create table后直接insert的会话略有区别：11.2(insert)->5.2(更新undo header事务表)->5.1(前映像写入undo block)
>>>>> insert后commit
drop table scott.t0115_2;
create table scott.t0115_2 (id number,col2 varchar2(1)) tablespace test1;
alter system switch logfile;
col member format a50
set linesize 100
select lf.member,l.status,l.sequence# from v$log l,v$logfile lf where l.group#=lf.group#;
MEMBER STATUS SEQUENCE#
-------------------------------------------------- ---------------- ----------
/odata/redo/ORA55/onlinelog/o1_mf_1_d4wdjm7w_.log INACTIVE 61
/odata/redo/ORA55/onlinelog/o1_mf_2_d4wdjmmx_.log ACTIVE 62
/odata/redo/ORA55/onlinelog/o1_mf_3_d4wdjn3k_.log CURRENT 63
insert into scott.t0115_2 values(1,'A');
commit;
select dbms_rowid.rowid_block_number(rowid),dbms_rowid.rowid_relative_fno(rowid) from scott.t0115_2;
DBMS_ROWID.ROWID_BLOCK_NUMBER( DBMS_ROWID.ROWID_RELATIVE_FNO(
------------------------------ ------------------------------
358 4
select value from v$diag_info where name='Default Trace File';
VALUE
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
/oracle/app/oracle/diag/rdbms/ora55/ora55/trace/ora55_ora_18022448.trc
alter system dump logfile '/odata/redo/ORA55/onlinelog/o1_mf_3_d4wdjn3k_.log' dba min 4 358 dba max 4 358;
***ora55_ora_18022448.trc文件内容
REDO RECORD - Thread:1 RBA: 0x00003a.0000000d.00f4 LEN: 0x005c VLD: 0x01
SCN: 0x0000.001cc2e1 SUBSCN: 1 12/19/2016 15:52:41
(LWN RBA: 0x00003a.0000000d.0010 LEN: 0003 NST: 0001 SCN: 0x0000.001cc2e1)
CHANGE #1 TYP:1 CLS:1 AFN:4 DBA:0x0100015e OBJ:14375 SCN:0x0000.001cc2e0 SEQ:1 OP:13.21 ENC:0 RBL:0
ktspbfredo - Format Pagetable Datablock
Parent(l1) DBA: 0x01000158 typ: 1 objd: 14375 itls: 2 fmt_flag: 0 poff: 0
cscn: 0x0000.001cc2e1 inc#:0
REDO RECORD - Thread:1 RBA: 0x00003a.0000000e.0094 LEN: 0x016c VLD: 0x01
SCN: 0x0000.001cc2e1 SUBSCN: 2 12/19/2016 15:52:41
CHANGE #1 TYP:0 CLS:33 AFN:3 DBA:0x00c00100 OBJ:4294967295 SCN:0x0000.001cc299 SEQ:1 OP:5.2 ENC:0 RBL:0
ktudh redo: slt: 0x0020 sqn: 0x000000cb flg: 0x0012 siz: 112 fbi: 0
uba: 0x00c000cb.008d.0d pxid: 0x0000.000.00000000
CHANGE #2 TYP:0 CLS:34 AFN:3 DBA:0x00c000cb OBJ:4294967295 SCN:0x0000.001cc298 SEQ:2 OP:5.1 ENC:0 RBL:0
ktudb redo: siz: 112 spc: 4338 flg: 0x0012 seq: 0x008d rec: 0x0d
xid: 0x0009.020.000000cb
ktubl redo: slt: 32 rci: 0 opc: 11.1 [objn: 14375 objd: 14375 tsn: 4]
Undo type: Regular undo Begin trans Last buffer split: No
Temp Object: No
Tablespace Undo: No
0x00000000 prev ctl uba: 0x00c000cb.008d.0b
prev ctl max cmt scn: 0x0000.001cb7da prev tx cmt scn: 0x0000.001cb7fd
txn start scn: 0xffff.ffffffff logon user: 0 prev brb: 12583113 prev bcl: 0 BuExt idx: 0 flg2: 0
KDO undo record:
KTB Redo
op: 0x03 ver: 0x01
compat bit: 4 (post-11) padding: 1
op: Z
KDO Op code: DRP row dependencies Disabled
xtype: XA flags: 0x00000000 bdba: 0x0100015e hdba: 0x0100015a
itli: 1 ispac: 0 maxfr: 4858
tabn: 0 slot: 0(0x0)
CHANGE #3 TYP:0 CLS:1 AFN:4 DBA:0x0100015e OBJ:14375 SCN:0x0000.001cc2e1 SEQ:1 OP:11.2 ENC:0 RBL:0
KTB Redo
op: 0x01 ver: 0x01
compat bit: 4 (post-11) padding: 1
op: F xid: 0x0009.020.000000cb uba: 0x00c000cb.008d.0d
KDO Op code: IRP row dependencies Disabled
xtype: XA flags: 0x00000000 bdba: 0x0100015e hdba: 0x0100015a
itli: 1 ispac: 0 maxfr: 4858
tabn: 0 slot: 0(0x0) size/delt: 8
fb: --H-FL-- lb: 0x1 cc: 2
null: --
col 0: [ 2] c1 02
col 1: [ 1] 41
我们发现虽然发布了commit，但dump出来的redo里仍然没有commit的操作。redo的记录顺序为：
下面另启一个session往表中插入一条记录
SQL> select * from scott.t0115_2;
ID C
---------- -
1 A
SQL> insert into scott.t0115_2 values(2,'B');
1 row created.
SQL> commit;
Commit complete.
col member format a50
set linesize 100
select lf.member,l.status,l.sequence# from v$log l,v$logfile lf where l.group#=lf.group#;
MEMBER STATUS SEQUENCE#
-------------------------------------------------- ---------------- ----------
/odata/redo/ORA55/onlinelog/o1_mf_1_d4wdjm7w_.log INACTIVE 64
/odata/redo/ORA55/onlinelog/o1_mf_2_d4wdjmmx_.log CURRENT 65
/odata/redo/ORA55/onlinelog/o1_mf_3_d4wdjn3k_.log INACTIVE 63
SQL> select dbms_rowid.rowid_block_number(rowid),dbms_rowid.rowid_relative_fno(rowid) from scott.t0115_2;
DBMS_ROWID.ROWID_BLOCK_NUMBER(ROWID) DBMS_ROWID.ROWID_RELATIVE_FNO(ROWID)
------------------------------------ ------------------------------------
12651 4
12651 4
SQL> select value from v$diag_info where name='Default Trace File';
VALUE
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
/oracle/app/oracle/diag/rdbms/ora55/ora55/trace/ora55_ora_15925404.trc
SQL> alter system dump logfile '/odata/redo/ORA55/onlinelog/o1_mf_2_d4wdjmmx_.log' dba min 4 12651 dba max 4 12651;
System altered.
***ora55_ora_15925404.trc文件内容：
REDO RECORD - Thread:1 RBA: 0x000041.00000b0b.0010 LEN: 0x01e0 VLD: 0x0d
SCN: 0x0000.001ce21e SUBSCN: 1 12/19/2016 21:08:25
(LWN RBA: 0x000041.00000b0b.0010 LEN: 0001 NST: 0001 SCN: 0x0000.001ce21d)
CHANGE #1 TYP:2 CLS:1 AFN:4 DBA:0x0100316b OBJ:14378 SCN:0x0000.001ce0ad SEQ:1 OP:11.2 ENC:0 RBL:0
KTB Redo
op: 0x01 ver: 0x01
compat bit: 4 (post-11) padding: 1
op: F xid: 0x0003.00d.000000a4 uba: 0x00c000a3.0081.16
KDO Op code: IRP row dependencies Disabled
xtype: XA flags: 0x00000000 bdba: 0x0100316b hdba: 0x0100316a
itli: 2 ispac: 0 maxfr: 4858
tabn: 0 slot: 1(0x1) size/delt: 8
fb: --H-FL-- lb: 0x2 cc: 2
null: --
col 0: [ 2] c1 03
col 1: [ 1] 42
CHANGE #2 TYP:0 CLS:21 AFN:3 DBA:0x00c000a0 OBJ:4294967295 SCN:0x0000.001ce1dd SEQ:1 OP:5.2 ENC:0 RBL:0
ktudh redo: slt: 0x000d sqn: 0x000000a4 flg: 0x0012 siz: 112 fbi: 0
uba: 0x00c000a3.0081.16 pxid: 0x0000.000.00000000
CHANGE #3 TYP:0 CLS:21 AFN:3 DBA:0x00c000a0 OBJ:4294967295 SCN:0x0000.001ce21e SEQ:1 OP:5.4 ENC:0 RBL:0
ktucm redo: slt: 0x000d sqn: 0x000000a4 srt: 0 sta: 9 flg: 0x2 ktucf redo: uba: 0x00c000a3.0081.16 ext: 0 spc: 5438 fbi: 0
CHANGE #4 TYP:0 CLS:22 AFN:3 DBA:0x00c000a3 OBJ:4294967295 SCN:0x0000.001ce1dc SEQ:1 OP:5.1 ENC:0 RBL:0
ktudb redo: siz: 112 spc: 5552 flg: 0x0012 seq: 0x0081 rec: 0x16
xid: 0x0003.00d.000000a4
ktubl redo: slt: 13 rci: 0 opc: 11.1 [objn: 14378 objd: 14378 tsn: 4]
Undo type: Regular undo Begin trans Last buffer split: No
Temp Object: No
Tablespace Undo: No
0x00000000 prev ctl uba: 0x00c000a3.0081.15
prev ctl max cmt scn: 0x0000.001cc3ee prev tx cmt scn: 0x0000.001cc3ef
txn start scn: 0x0000.00000000 logon user: 0 prev brb: 12583274 prev bcl: 0 BuExt idx: 0 flg2: 0
KDO undo record:
KTB Redo
op: 0x03 ver: 0x01
compat bit: 4 (post-11) padding: 1
op: Z
KDO Op code: DRP row dependencies Disabled
xtype: XA flags: 0x00000000 bdba: 0x0100316b hdba: 0x0100316a
itli: 2 ispac: 0 maxfr: 4858
tabn: 0 slot: 1(0x1)
END OF REDO DUMP
阶段结论：insert后不commit的场景下，redolog里不会出现commit；insert如果与create table在一个会话里那么即便insert后执行了commit，在redolog里也有可能找不到commit，这时在redolog里会多出一个OP:13.21(format pagetable datablock)的操作；如果insert在单独的会话里那么commit的记录会在redo里找到。
上述四个场景产生的redo顺序分别是：
(1) insert与create table在一个session里，insert后不commit：13.21(format new block)->5.2(更新undo header事务表)->5.1(前映像写入undo block)->11.2(insert)
(2) insert在独立的session里，insert后不commit：11.2(insert)->5.2(更新undo header事务表)->5.1(前映像写入undo block)
(3) insert与create table在一个session里，insert后commit：13.21(format new block)->5.2(更新undo header事务表)->5.1(前映像写入undo block)->11.2(insert)
(4) insert在独立的session里，insert后commit：11.2(insert)->5.2(更新undo header事务表)->5.4(commit)->5.1(前映像写入undo block)
//
// commit与不commit的情况下对于update语句记入Redo的内容有何差异
//
>>>>> update后不commit
SQL> select * from scott.t0115_2;
ID C
---------- -
1 A
SQL> select dbms_rowid.rowid_block_number(rowid),dbms_rowid.rowid_relative_fno(rowid) from scott.t0115_2;
DBMS_ROWID.ROWID_BLOCK_NUMBER(ROWID) DBMS_ROWID.ROWID_RELATIVE_FNO(ROWID)
------------------------------------ ------------------------------------
350 4
alter system switch logfile;
col member format a50
set linesize 100
select lf.member,l.status,l.sequence# from v$log l,v$logfile lf where l.group#=lf.group#;
MEMBER STATUS SEQUENCE#
-------------------------------------------------- ---------------- ----------
/odata/redo/ORA55/onlinelog/o1_mf_1_d4wdjm7w_.log ACTIVE 58
/odata/redo/ORA55/onlinelog/o1_mf_2_d4wdjmmx_.log CURRENT 59
/odata/redo/ORA55/onlinelog/o1_mf_3_d4wdjn3k_.log INACTIVE 57
update scott.t0115_2 set col2='a' where id=1;
alter system dump logfile '/odata/redo/ORA55/onlinelog/o1_mf_2_d4wdjmmx_.log' dba min 4 350 dba max 4 350;
select value from v$diag_info where name='Default Trace File';
VALUE
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
/oracle/app/oracle/diag/rdbms/ora55/ora55/trace/ora55_ora_42598518.trc
***ora55_ora_42598518.trc内容
REDO RECORD - Thread:1 RBA: 0x00003b.00000004.0010 LEN: 0x01fc VLD: 0x0d
SCN: 0x0000.001ccab1 SUBSCN: 1 12/19/2016 17:12:34
(LWN RBA: 0x00003b.00000004.0010 LEN: 0002 NST: 0001 SCN: 0x0000.001ccab1)
CHANGE #1 TYP:2 CLS:1 AFN:4 DBA:0x0100015e OBJ:14375 SCN:0x0000.001cc2e2 SEQ:1 OP:11.19 ENC:0 RBL:0
KTB Redo
op: 0x11 ver: 0x01
compat bit: 4 (post-11) padding: 1
op: F xid: 0x000a.011.000007fc uba: 0x00c001b2.01d9.48
Block cleanout record, scn: 0x0000.001cca92 ver: 0x01 opt: 0x02, entries follow...
itli: 1 flg: 2 scn: 0x0000.001cc2e2
Array Update of 1 rows:
tabn: 0 slot: 0(0x0) flag: 0x2c lock: 2 ckix: 1
ncol: 2 nnew: 1 size: 0
KDO Op code: 21 row dependencies Disabled
xtype: XAxtype KDO_KDOM2 flags: 0x00000080 bdba: 0x0100015e hdba: 0x0100015a
itli: 2 ispac: 0 maxfr: 4858
vect = 3
col 1: [ 1] 61
CHANGE #2 TYP:0 CLS:35 AFN:3 DBA:0x00c00110 OBJ:4294967295 SCN:0x0000.001cca20 SEQ:1 OP:5.2 ENC:0 RBL:0
ktudh redo: slt: 0x0011 sqn: 0x000007fc flg: 0x0012 siz: 164 fbi: 0
uba: 0x00c001b2.01d9.48 pxid: 0x0000.000.00000000
CHANGE #3 TYP:0 CLS:36 AFN:3 DBA:0x00c001b2 OBJ:4294967295 SCN:0x0000.001cca1f SEQ:1 OP:5.1 ENC:0 RBL:0
ktudb redo: siz: 164 spc: 1228 flg: 0x0012 seq: 0x01d9 rec: 0x48
xid: 0x000a.011.000007fc
ktubl redo: slt: 17 rci: 0 opc: 11.1 [objn: 14375 objd: 14375 tsn: 4]
Undo type: Regular undo Begin trans Last buffer split: No
Temp Object: No
Tablespace Undo: No
0x00000000 prev ctl uba: 0x00c001b2.01d9.46
prev ctl max cmt scn: 0x0000.001cc7a3 prev tx cmt scn: 0x0000.001cc7a4
txn start scn: 0x0000.001cca9c logon user: 0 prev brb: 12583311 prev bcl: 0 BuExt idx: 0 flg2: 0
KDO undo record:
KTB Redo
op: 0x03 ver: 0x01
compat bit: 4 (post-11) padding: 1
op: Z
Array Update of 1 rows:
tabn: 0 slot: 0(0x0) flag: 0x2c lock: 0 ckix: 1
ncol: 2 nnew: 1 size: 0
KDO Op code: 21 row dependencies Disabled
xtype: XAxtype KDO_KDOM2 flags: 0x00000080 bdba: 0x0100015e hdba: 0x0100015a
itli: 2 ispac: 0 maxfr: 4858
vect = 3
col 1: [ 1] 41
END OF REDO DUMP
>>>>> update后commit
SQL> select * from scott.t0115_2;
ID C
---------- -
1 A
SQL> select dbms_rowid.rowid_block_number(rowid),dbms_rowid.rowid_relative_fno(rowid) from scott.t0115_2;
DBMS_ROWID.ROWID_BLOCK_NUMBER(ROWID) DBMS_ROWID.ROWID_RELATIVE_FNO(ROWID)
------------------------------------ ------------------------------------
350 4
alter system switch logfile;
col member format a50
set linesize 100
select lf.member,l.status,l.sequence# from v$log l,v$logfile lf where l.group#=lf.group#;
MEMBER STATUS SEQUENCE#
-------------------------------------------------- ---------------- ----------
/odata/redo/ORA55/onlinelog/o1_mf_1_d4wdjm7w_.log INACTIVE 61
/odata/redo/ORA55/onlinelog/o1_mf_2_d4wdjmmx_.log CURRENT 62
/odata/redo/ORA55/onlinelog/o1_mf_3_d4wdjn3k_.log INACTIVE 60
update scott.t0115_2 set col2='b' where id=1;
commit;
alter system dump logfile '/odata/redo/ORA55/onlinelog/o1_mf_2_d4wdjmmx_.log' dba min 4 350 dba max 4 350;
select value from v$diag_info where name='Default Trace File';
VALUE
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
/oracle/app/oracle/diag/rdbms/ora55/ora55/trace/ora55_ora_8323230.trc
***ora55_ora_8323230.trc内容如下：
REDO RECORD - Thread:1 RBA: 0x00003e.00000002.0010 LEN: 0x025c VLD: 0x0d
SCN: 0x0000.001cdcbd SUBSCN: 1 12/19/2016 20:19:19
(LWN RBA: 0x00003e.00000002.0010 LEN: 0002 NST: 0001 SCN: 0x0000.001cdcbc)
CHANGE #1 TYP:2 CLS:1 AFN:4 DBA:0x0100015e OBJ:14375 SCN:0x0000.001ccd96 SEQ:2 OP:11.19 ENC:0 RBL:0
KTB Redo
op: 0x11 ver: 0x01
compat bit: 4 (post-11) padding: 1
op: F xid: 0x000a.01f.00000808 uba: 0x00c001c2.01dd.11
Block cleanout record, scn: 0x0000.001cdcbb ver: 0x01 opt: 0x02, entries follow...
itli: 1 flg: 2 scn: 0x0000.001ccd96
Array Update of 1 rows:
tabn: 0 slot: 0(0x0) flag: 0x2c lock: 2 ckix: 1
ncol: 2 nnew: 1 size: 0
KDO Op code: 21 row dependencies Disabled
xtype: XAxtype KDO_KDOM2 flags: 0x00000080 bdba: 0x0100015e hdba: 0x0100015a
itli: 2 ispac: 0 maxfr: 4858
vect = 3
col 1: [ 1] 62
CHANGE #2 TYP:0 CLS:35 AFN:3 DBA:0x00c00110 OBJ:4294967295 SCN:0x0000.001cdc0a SEQ:1 OP:5.2 ENC:0 RBL:0
ktudh redo: slt: 0x001f sqn: 0x00000808 flg: 0x0012 siz: 188 fbi: 0
uba: 0x00c001c2.01dd.11 pxid: 0x0000.000.00000000
CHANGE #3 TYP:0 CLS:35 AFN:3 DBA:0x00c00110 OBJ:4294967295 SCN:0x0000.001cdcbd SEQ:1 OP:5.4 ENC:0 RBL:0
ktucm redo: slt: 0x001f sqn: 0x00000808 srt: 0 sta: 9 flg: 0x2 ktucf redo: uba: 0x00c001c2.01dd.11 ext: 3 spc: 5068 fbi: 0
CHANGE #4 TYP:0 CLS:36 AFN:3 DBA:0x00c001c2 OBJ:4294967295 SCN:0x0000.001cdc09 SEQ:1 OP:5.1 ENC:0 RBL:0
ktudb redo: siz: 188 spc: 5258 flg: 0x0012 seq: 0x01dd rec: 0x11
xid: 0x000a.01f.00000808
ktubl redo: slt: 31 rci: 0 opc: 11.1 [objn: 14375 objd: 14375 tsn: 4]
Undo type: Regular undo Begin trans Last buffer split: No
Temp Object: No
Tablespace Undo: No
0x00000000 prev ctl uba: 0x00c001c2.01dd.10
prev ctl max cmt scn: 0x0000.001cdbcd prev tx cmt scn: 0x0000.001cdbcf
txn start scn: 0x0000.00000000 logon user: 0 prev brb: 12583360 prev bcl: 0 BuExt idx: 0 flg2: 0
KDO undo record:
KTB Redo
op: 0x04 ver: 0x01
compat bit: 4 (post-11) padding: 1
op: L itl: xid: 0x000a.00a.000007f9 uba: 0x00c001b0.01d9.04
flg: C--- lkc: 0 scn: 0x0000.001ccbd3
Array Update of 1 rows:
tabn: 0 slot: 0(0x0) flag: 0x2c lock: 0 ckix: 1
ncol: 2 nnew: 1 size: 0
KDO Op code: 21 row dependencies Disabled
xtype: XAxtype KDO_KDOM2 flags: 0x00000080 bdba: 0x0100015e hdba: 0x0100015a
itli: 2 ispac: 0 maxfr: 4858
vect = 3
col 1: [ 1] 62
阶段小结：
update不commit的情况下，redo里的操作顺序是：11.19(update)->5.2(undo header事务表更新)->5.1(前映像写入undo block);
update且commit的情况下，redo里的操作顺序是：11.19(update)->5.2(undo header事务表更新)->5.4(commit)->5.1(前映像写入undo block);
//
// commit与不commit的情况下对于delete语句记入Redo的内容有何差异
//
>>>>> delete后不commit
SQL> select * from scott.t0115_2;
ID C
---------- -
1 A
2 B
3 C
SQL> select dbms_rowid.rowid_block_number(rowid),dbms_rowid.rowid_relative_fno(rowid) from scott.t0115_2;
DBMS_ROWID.ROWID_BLOCK_NUMBER(ROWID) DBMS_ROWID.ROWID_RELATIVE_FNO(ROWID)
------------------------------------ ------------------------------------
12651 4
12651 4
12653 4
alter system switch logfile;
col member format a50
set linesize 100
select lf.member,l.status,l.sequence# from v$log l,v$logfile lf where l.group#=lf.group#;
MEMBER STATUS SEQUENCE#
-------------------------------------------------- ---------------- ----------
/odata/redo/ORA55/onlinelog/o1_mf_1_d4wdjm7w_.log ACTIVE 73
/odata/redo/ORA55/onlinelog/o1_mf_2_d4wdjmmx_.log CURRENT 74
/odata/redo/ORA55/onlinelog/o1_mf_3_d4wdjn3k_.log INACTIVE 72
delete scott.t0115_2 where id=3;
alter system dump logfile '/odata/redo/ORA55/onlinelog/o1_mf_2_d4wdjmmx_.log' dba min 4 12653 dba max 4 12653;
select value from v$diag_info where name='Default Trace File';
VALUE
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
/oracle/app/oracle/diag/rdbms/ora55/ora55/trace/ora55_ora_34013408.trc
***ora55_ora_34013408.trc内容
REDO RECORD - Thread:1 RBA: 0x00004a.00000104.0010 LEN: 0x01c0 VLD: 0x0d
SCN: 0x0000.002277c0 SUBSCN: 1 12/28/2016 18:06:16
(LWN RBA: 0x00004a.00000104.0010 LEN: 0001 NST: 0001 SCN: 0x0000.002277bf)
CHANGE #1 TYP:2 CLS:1 AFN:4 DBA:0x0100316d OBJ:14378 SCN:0x0000.001cfebf SEQ:1 OP:11.3 ENC:0 RBL:0
KTB Redo
op: 0x11 ver: 0x01
compat bit: 4 (post-11) padding: 1
op: F xid: 0x000a.00f.00000bb8 uba: 0x00c00115.03b2.07
Block cleanout record, scn: 0x0000.002277c0 ver: 0x01 opt: 0x02, entries follow...
itli: 1 flg: 2 scn: 0x0000.001cfebf
KDO Op code: DRP row dependencies Disabled
xtype: XA flags: 0x00000000 bdba: 0x0100316d hdba: 0x0100316a
itli: 2 ispac: 0 maxfr: 4858
tabn: 0 slot: 0(0x0)
CHANGE #2 TYP:0 CLS:35 AFN:3 DBA:0x00c00110 OBJ:4294967295 SCN:0x0000.002277ad SEQ:1 OP:5.2 ENC:0 RBL:0
ktudh redo: slt: 0x000f sqn: 0x00000bb8 flg: 0x0012 siz: 156 fbi: 0
uba: 0x00c00115.03b2.07 pxid: 0x0000.000.00000000
CHANGE #3 TYP:0 CLS:36 AFN:3 DBA:0x00c00115 OBJ:4294967295 SCN:0x0000.002277ac SEQ:1 OP:5.1 ENC:0 RBL:0
ktudb redo: siz: 156 spc: 7334 flg: 0x0012 seq: 0x03b2 rec: 0x07
xid: 0x000a.00f.00000bb8
ktubl redo: slt: 15 rci: 0 opc: 11.1 [objn: 14378 objd: 14378 tsn: 4]
Undo type: Regular undo Begin trans Last buffer split: No
Temp Object: No
Tablespace Undo: No
0x00000000 prev ctl uba: 0x00c00115.03b2.05
prev ctl max cmt scn: 0x0000.0022776c prev tx cmt scn: 0x0000.0022776d
txn start scn: 0x0000.00000000 logon user: 0 prev brb: 12583188 prev bcl: 0 BuExt idx: 0 flg2: 0
KDO undo record:
KTB Redo
op: 0x03 ver: 0x01
compat bit: 4 (post-11) padding: 1
op: Z
KDO Op code: IRP row dependencies Disabled
xtype: XA flags: 0x00000000 bdba: 0x0100316d hdba: 0x0100316a
itli: 2 ispac: 0 maxfr: 4858
tabn: 0 slot: 0(0x0) size/delt: 8
fb: --H-FL-- lb: 0x0 cc: 2
null: --
col 0: [ 2] c1 04
col 1: [ 1] 43
END OF REDO DUMP
>>>>> delete后commit
将上一个场景delete后未提交的事务通过alter system disconnect session强行kill掉，开测下面的场景
SQL> select * from scott.t0115_2;
ID C
---------- -
1 A
2 B
3 C
SQL> select dbms_rowid.rowid_block_number(rowid),dbms_rowid.rowid_relative_fno(rowid) from scott.t0115_2;
DBMS_ROWID.ROWID_BLOCK_NUMBER(ROWID) DBMS_ROWID.ROWID_RELATIVE_FNO(ROWID)
------------------------------------ ------------------------------------
12651 4
12651 4
12653 4
alter system switch logfile;
col member format a50
set linesize 100
select lf.member,l.status,l.sequence# from v$log l,v$logfile lf where l.group#=lf.group#;
MEMBER STATUS SEQUENCE#
-------------------------------------------------- ---------------- ----------
/odata/redo/ORA55/onlinelog/o1_mf_1_d4wdjm7w_.log INACTIVE 73
/odata/redo/ORA55/onlinelog/o1_mf_2_d4wdjmmx_.log ACTIVE 74
/odata/redo/ORA55/onlinelog/o1_mf_3_d4wdjn3k_.log CURRENT 75
delete scott.t0115_2 where id=3;
commit;
alter system dump logfile '/odata/redo/ORA55/onlinelog/o1_mf_3_d4wdjn3k_.log' dba min 4 12653 dba max 4 12653;
select value from v$diag_info where name='Default Trace File';
VALUE
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
/oracle/app/oracle/diag/rdbms/ora55/ora55/trace/ora55_ora_20775002.trc
***ora55_ora_20775002.trc内容如下：
REDO RECORD - Thread:1 RBA: 0x00004b.00000004.014c LEN: 0x0040 VLD: 0x01
SCN: 0x0000.00227a73 SUBSCN: 1 12/28/2016 18:21:50
(LWN RBA: 0x00004b.00000004.0010 LEN: 0001 NST: 0001 SCN: 0x0000.00227a73)
CHANGE #1 TYP:0 CLS:1 AFN:4 DBA:0x0100316d OBJ:14378 SCN:0x0000.00227a60 SEQ:1 OP:4.1 ENC:0 RBL:0
Block cleanout record, scn: 0x0000.00227a73 ver: 0x01 opt: 0x01, entries follow...
REDO RECORD - Thread:1 RBA: 0x00004b.00000005.0010 LEN: 0x0070 VLD: 0x06
SCN: 0x0000.00227a8c SUBSCN: 1 12/28/2016 18:23:02
(LWN RBA: 0x00004b.00000005.0010 LEN: 0001 NST: 0001 SCN: 0x0000.00227a8c)
CHANGE #1 MEDIA RECOVERY MARKER SCN:0x0000.00000000 SEQ:0 OP:23.1 ENC:0
Block Written - afn: 4 rdba: 0x0100316d BFT:(1024,16789869) non-BFT:(4,12653)
scn: 0x0000.00227a73 seq: 0x01 flg:0x04
REDO RECORD - Thread:1 RBA: 0x00004b.00000006.0010 LEN: 0x00f0 VLD: 0x05
SCN: 0x0000.00227aa4 SUBSCN: 1 12/28/2016 18:24:11
(LWN RBA: 0x00004b.00000006.0010 LEN: 0001 NST: 0001 SCN: 0x0000.00227aa4)
CHANGE #1 TYP:0 CLS:1 AFN:4 DBA:0x0100316d OBJ:14378 SCN:0x0000.00227a73 SEQ:1 OP:11.2 ENC:0 RBL:0
KTB Redo
op: 0x03 ver: 0x01
compat bit: 4 (post-11) padding: 1
op: Z
KDO Op code: IRP row dependencies Disabled
xtype: XR flags: 0x00000000 bdba: 0x0100316d hdba: 0x0100316a
itli: 2 ispac: 0 maxfr: 4858
tabn: 0 slot: 0(0x0) size/delt: 8
fb: --H-FL-- lb: 0x0 cc: 2
null: --
col 0: [ 2] c1 04
col 1: [ 1] 43
CHANGE #2 TYP:0 CLS:35 AFN:3 DBA:0x00c00110 OBJ:4294967295 SCN:0x0000.00227827 SEQ:2 OP:5.11 ENC:0 RBL:0
ktubu redo: slt: 15 rci: 0 opc: 11.1 objn: 14378 objd: 14378 tsn: 4
Undo type: Regular undo Undo type: User undo done Begin trans Last buffer split: No
Tablespace Undo: No
0x00000000
BuExt idx: 0 flg2: 0
REDO RECORD - Thread:1 RBA: 0x00004b.00000007.0010 LEN: 0x0198 VLD: 0x0d
SCN: 0x0000.00227aa6 SUBSCN: 1 12/28/2016 18:24:11
(LWN RBA: 0x00004b.00000007.0010 LEN: 0002 NST: 0001 SCN: 0x0000.00227aa6)
CHANGE #1 TYP:0 CLS:1 AFN:4 DBA:0x0100316d OBJ:14378 SCN:0x0000.00227aa4 SEQ:1 OP:11.3 ENC:0 RBL:0
KTB Redo
op: 0x01 ver: 0x01
compat bit: 4 (post-11) padding: 1
op: F xid: 0x000a.00a.00000bbb uba: 0x00c00116.03b2.02
KDO Op code: DRP row dependencies Disabled
xtype: XA flags: 0x00000000 bdba: 0x0100316d hdba: 0x0100316a
itli: 2 ispac: 0 maxfr: 4858
tabn: 0 slot: 0(0x0)
CHANGE #2 TYP:0 CLS:35 AFN:3 DBA:0x00c00110 OBJ:4294967295 SCN:0x0000.00227aa5 SEQ:1 OP:5.2 ENC:0 RBL:0
ktudh redo: slt: 0x000a sqn: 0x00000bbb flg: 0x0012 siz: 156 fbi: 0
uba: 0x00c00116.03b2.02 pxid: 0x0000.000.00000000
CHANGE #3 TYP:0 CLS:36 AFN:3 DBA:0x00c00116 OBJ:4294967295 SCN:0x0000.00227825 SEQ:2 OP:5.1 ENC:0 RBL:0
ktudb redo: siz: 156 spc: 8068 flg: 0x0012 seq: 0x03b2 rec: 0x02
xid: 0x000a.00a.00000bbb
ktubl redo: slt: 10 rci: 0 opc: 11.1 [objn: 14378 objd: 14378 tsn: 4]
Undo type: Regular undo Begin trans Last buffer split: No
Temp Object: No
Tablespace Undo: No
0x00000000 prev ctl uba: 0x00c00116.03b2.01
prev ctl max cmt scn: 0x0000.0022776f prev tx cmt scn: 0x0000.00227773
txn start scn: 0x0000.00227a73 logon user: 0 prev brb: 12583188 prev bcl: 0 BuExt idx: 0 flg2: 0
KDO undo record:
KTB Redo
op: 0x03 ver: 0x01
compat bit: 4 (post-11) padding: 1
op: Z
KDO Op code: IRP row dependencies Disabled
xtype: XA flags: 0x00000000 bdba: 0x0100316d hdba: 0x0100316a
itli: 2 ispac: 0 maxfr: 4858
tabn: 0 slot: 0(0x0) size/delt: 8
fb: --H-FL-- lb: 0x0 cc: 2
null: --
col 0: [ 2] c1 04
col 1: [ 1] 43
END OF REDO DUMP
阶段小结：
从上述两段dump的结果来看，delete后commit的情况下并没有发现OP:5.4的操作，与不commit的情况产生的redo记录并无多大差别，均按照如下顺序进行
11.3(delete)->5.2(undo header事务表更新)->5.1(前映像写入undo block);
再进行一次delete后commit的测试：
SQL> select * from scott.t0115_2;
ID C
---------- -
1 A
2 B
SQL> select dbms_rowid.rowid_block_number(rowid),dbms_rowid.rowid_relative_fno(rowid) from scott.t0115_2;
DBMS_ROWID.ROWID_BLOCK_NUMBER(ROWID) DBMS_ROWID.ROWID_RELATIVE_FNO(ROWID)
------------------------------------ ------------------------------------
12651 4
12651 4
alter system switch logfile;
col member format a50
set linesize 100
select lf.member,l.status,l.sequence# from v$log l,v$logfile lf where l.group#=lf.group#;
MEMBER STATUS SEQUENCE#
-------------------------------------------------- ---------------- ----------
/odata/redo/ORA55/onlinelog/o1_mf_1_d4wdjm7w_.log CURRENT 76
/odata/redo/ORA55/onlinelog/o1_mf_2_d4wdjmmx_.log INACTIVE 74
/odata/redo/ORA55/onlinelog/o1_mf_3_d4wdjn3k_.log INACTIVE 75
delete scott.t0115_2 where id=2;
commit;
alter system dump logfile '/odata/redo/ORA55/onlinelog/o1_mf_1_d4wdjm7w_.log' dba min 4 12651 dba max 4 12651;
select value from v$diag_info where name='Default Trace File';
VALUE
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
/oracle/app/oracle/diag/rdbms/ora55/ora55/trace/ora55_ora_14811308.trc
***ora55_ora_14811308.trc内容如下：
REDO RECORD - Thread:1 RBA: 0x00004c.00000002.0010 LEN: 0x0228 VLD: 0x0d
SCN: 0x0000.00227d5e SUBSCN: 1 12/28/2016 18:56:42
(LWN RBA: 0x00004c.00000002.0010 LEN: 0002 NST: 0001 SCN: 0x0000.00227d5c)
CHANGE #1 TYP:2 CLS:1 AFN:4 DBA:0x0100316b OBJ:14378 SCN:0x0000.001ce21e SEQ:2 OP:11.3 ENC:0 RBL:0
KTB Redo
op: 0x11 ver: 0x01
compat bit: 4 (post-11) padding: 1
op: F xid: 0x0007.00f.000000e3 uba: 0x00c00db9.006a.0e
Block cleanout record, scn: 0x0000.00227d5d ver: 0x01 opt: 0x02, entries follow...
itli: 1 flg: 2 scn: 0x0000.001ce0ad
itli: 2 flg: 2 scn: 0x0000.001ce21e
KDO Op code: DRP row dependencies Disabled
xtype: XA flags: 0x00000000 bdba: 0x0100316b hdba: 0x0100316a
itli: 1 ispac: 0 maxfr: 4858
tabn: 0 slot: 1(0x1)
CHANGE #2 TYP:0 CLS:29 AFN:3 DBA:0x00c000e0 OBJ:4294967295 SCN:0x0000.00227b93 SEQ:1 OP:5.2 ENC:0 RBL:0
ktudh redo: slt: 0x000f sqn: 0x000000e3 flg: 0x0012 siz: 180 fbi: 0
uba: 0x00c00db9.006a.0e pxid: 0x0000.000.00000000
CHANGE #3 TYP:0 CLS:29 AFN:3 DBA:0x00c000e0 OBJ:4294967295 SCN:0x0000.00227d5e SEQ:1 OP:5.4 ENC:0 RBL:0
ktucm redo: slt: 0x000f sqn: 0x000000e3 srt: 0 sta: 9 flg: 0x2 ktucf redo: uba: 0x00c00db9.006a.0e ext: 2 spc: 6066 fbi: 0
CHANGE #4 TYP:0 CLS:30 AFN:3 DBA:0x00c00db9 OBJ:4294967295 SCN:0x0000.00227b92 SEQ:2 OP:5.1 ENC:0 RBL:0
ktudb redo: siz: 180 spc: 6248 flg: 0x0012 seq: 0x006a rec: 0x0e
xid: 0x0007.00f.000000e3
ktubl redo: slt: 15 rci: 0 opc: 11.1 [objn: 14378 objd: 14378 tsn: 4]
Undo type: Regular undo Begin trans Last buffer split: No
Temp Object: No
Tablespace Undo: No
0x00000000 prev ctl uba: 0x00c00db9.006a.0c
prev ctl max cmt scn: 0x0000.00225a73 prev tx cmt scn: 0x0000.00225a74
txn start scn: 0x0000.00000000 logon user: 0 prev brb: 12586411 prev bcl: 0 BuExt idx: 0 flg2: 0
KDO undo record:
KTB Redo
op: 0x04 ver: 0x01
compat bit: 4 (post-11) padding: 1
op: L itl: xid: 0x0001.01a.00000097 uba: 0x00c00085.0091.39
flg: C--- lkc: 0 scn: 0x0000.001ce0ad
KDO Op code: IRP row dependencies Disabled
xtype: XA flags: 0x00000000 bdba: 0x0100316b hdba: 0x0100316a
itli: 1 ispac: 0 maxfr: 4858
tabn: 0 slot: 1(0x1) size/delt: 8
fb: --H-FL-- lb: 0x0 cc: 2
null: --
col 0: [ 2] c1 03
col 1: [ 1] 42
END OF REDO DUMP
阶段小结：
这次delete后commit的顺序恢复到了正常的顺序
11.3(delete)->5.2(undo header事务表更新)->5.4(commit)->5.1(前映像写入undo block);
因此，我们可以看出在delete操作后的commit再某些场景下是不会记录redo的
oracle没commit有日志吗,commit操作是否一定会被记录到redo等问题的研究相关推荐
- Oracle数据库开启归档日志和补充日志
文章目录 Oracle数据库开启归档日志和补充日志 重做日志的概念 归档日志 ARCHIVELOG模式 启动归档日志 归档日志的清理 补充日志 Oracle数据库开启归档日志和补充日志 项目中要对Or ...
- oracle的commit耗时长_ORACLE COMMIT操作的详解
通常对undo有一个误解,认为undo用于物理地恢复到执行语句或事务之前的样子,但实际上并非如此.数据库只是逻辑地恢复到原来的样子,所有修改都被逻辑地取消,但是数据结构以及数据库块本身在回滚后可能大不 ...
- oracle 安装时的日志文件,oracle10g安装的日志文件 Oracle10g怎么查看操作日志
如何查看oracle 10g 的操作日志 归档模式下怎么查询oracle 10g归档日志存放的路径? SQL> select name from v$archived_log; NAME /u0 ...
- oracle删除的数据没有commit,在Oracle中误删除数据后并commit后的数据恢复办法
在Oracle中误删除数据后并commit后的数据恢复办法 背景:表A数据误操作,被delete了,恢复. --1.先备份A表当前数据. --2.查询某 在Oracle中误删除数据后并commit后的 ...
- oracle进行日志切换,Oracle存档日志切换案例操作
当前位置:我的异常网» 数据库 » Oracle存档日志切换案例操作 Oracle存档日志切换案例操作 www.myexceptions.net 网友分享于:2014-12-29 浏览:0次 Or ...
- 把多个不连续的commit合并成一个commit
场景 1.多个commit是同一个功能(需求). 2.为了log信息更简洁. 3.代码管理更方便. 步骤 1.查看commit历史 2. 使用git rebase -i <需要合并的commit ...
- oracle首先创建三个表,oracle理论学习详解及各种简单操作例子(初学者必备)
oracle理论学习详解及各种简单操作例子(菜鸟必备) 1.数据库的发展过程 层次模型 -->网状模型 -->关系模型 -->对象关系模型 2.关于数据库的概念 DB:数据库(存储信 ...
- git commit —amend_Git之修改commit记录
在很多影视作品里,就算主人公乘上了时光鸡,还是无法修改历史(或者说修改后造成十分严重的后果):而现在,在 Git 的强力驱动下,修改历史变得简单又相对安全. 本文叨叨修改 commit 历史的问题 应 ...
- 在linux操作系统中启动oracle数据库程序,Linux系统下Oracle数据库的安装和启动关闭操作教程...
这篇文章主要介绍了Linux系统下Oracle数据库的安装和启动关闭操作教程,并针对在sqlplus下所需执行的命令进行讲解,需要的朋友可以参考下 1.准备: df -H 查看空间剩余 一般准备最 ...
- MySQL 之binlog日志说明及利用binlog日志恢复数据操作记录
众所周知,binlog日志对于mysql数据库来说是十分重要的.在数据丢失的紧急情况下,我们往往会想到用binlog日志功能进行数据恢复(定时全备份+binlog日志恢复增量数据部分),化险为夷! 一 ...
最新文章
- Google Latitude 能否成为所有移动社会网络的杀手？
- mongodb 安装pymongo 驱动
- 五百字简文告诉你美国为何要倾一国之力对中国的一家民营企业华为痛下杀手？...
- (chap8 确认访问用户身份的认证) 基于表单认证
- 2021-09-25
- Vue相关面试题及答案分享
- linux 逻辑卷 pe size 4.00 mib大小怎么改,linux逻辑卷的建立
- 阿米洛键盘取消win_阿米洛花旦娘静电容V2键盘测评：不止是一把好看的键盘
- Chapter7-8_Deep Learning for Constituency Parsing
- FireMonkey 源码学习（4）
- 你知道几句?Linux之父十大名言
- 纯真数据库 解析 php,PHP解析纯真IP数据库（qqwry.dat）
- intellij idea 2017破解
- 华为云计算IE面试笔记-云磁盘和普通磁盘的区别。
- 19c(19.3) 单机数据库静默安装
- mscorsvw.exe进程占用CPU资料80%以上的原因
- matlab中geoshow函数的使用/属性设置
- cuda之thread,block,gird详解
- 用Python处理Excel的14个常用操作
- 转：网络安全法重点解读