Samsung’s “Unpacked” event took place online on August 5th and since then, the question remains; Is the “premium” Note 20 worth, or is the Note 20 Ultra the better buy?

三星的“拆包”活动于8月5日在网上举行，此后问题依然存在。 “高级” Note 20是否值得，还是Note 20 Ultra更好？

Answer: No, the Note 20 isn’t worth to empty your wallet for! Here’s why!

答 ：不，Note 20不值得用来掏空钱包！ 这就是为什么！

内部规格 (Internal Specs)

So if we take a look, the Note 20 let’s take a look then at this

因此，如果我们看一下，Note 20让我们看一下

• Snapdragon 865+ chip

  骁龙865+芯片

• 8 gigabytes of ram

  8 GB的RAM

• 4300 milliamp-hour battery4300毫安时电池
• 128 gigabytes of non-expandable storage128 GB的不可扩展存储

So Snapdragon 865+ and 8 gigs of RAM as the only spec proves it’s high-end. The 8-gigabytes of RAM cut down a bit from the 12 gigs of RAM from the Ultra but without a doubt, it will still offer high-end performance.

因此，Snapdragon 865+和8 gigs RAM作为唯一的规格证明它是高端的。 8 GB的RAM比Ultra的12 GB的RAM减少了一点，但是毫无疑问，它仍将提供高端性能。

The 4,300 milliamp-hour battery is fine, slightly smaller than the Note 20 Ultra’s battery again, though the Note 20 is a smaller 6.7" phone. And since it’s only a 1080p60hertz display, it will provide a slightly better overall battery life on a charge than the Ultra.

4,300毫安小时的电池很好，虽然Note 20是较小的6.7英寸手机，但再次比Note 20 Ultra的电池略小。而且由于它只有1080p60Hz的显示屏，因此充电后总电池寿命会略长比超。

The 128 gigabytes of non-expandable storage (in the U.S) can feel a bit small to many for the only option. And again, others can say that 128 gigabytes is just right or overkill, we are in the age where we constantly capture life with the cameras all the time can start to eat up. Not just photos, but even with giving the ability to take 8K videos and have numerous apps, you would just think you could even have the ability to upgrade via a Micro SD. That is just reserved for the Ultra up to 512 gigs.

对于唯一的选择，128 GB的不可扩展存储(在美国)可能会有些小。 再说一次，其他人可以说128 GB是正确的还是过大的，我们正处于一个时代，我们一直在用相机不断捕捉生活，直到开始吞噬。 不仅是照片，而且即使可以拍摄8K视频并拥有众多应用程序，您也会认为您甚至可以通过Micro SD进行升级。 这仅适用于最多512演出的Ultra。

S笔 (S-Pen)

The upgraded S-Pen is worth a pat on the back for Samsung. It’s physically on both the Note 20 and the Ultra but latency drops a considerable amount of milliseconds. It drops from 42 to 26 milliseconds. Great, but not down to the 9 milliseconds like the Ultra because of it’s 120-hertz display. Again, it’s still incredibly fast and responsive and Apple Pencil level and competitor now!

升级后的S笔对于三星来说值得一拍。 Note 20和Ultra都在物理上使用它，但是等待时间却减少了相当多的毫秒。 它从42毫秒下降到26毫秒。 很棒，但由于它具有120赫兹的显示屏，所以它不比Ultra差9毫秒。 再次，它仍然是令人难以置信的快速和响应能力，现在是Apple Pencil的水平和竞争对手！

显示 (Display)

The Note 20 packs an AMOLED display but with only 1080p60 hertz, has a slightly larger hole punch, cutout for the same 10-megapixel selfie, and the same ultrasonic fingerprint reader underneath. The 1080p resolution is something that both phones have to undergo as the Ultra has to turn the resolution down to use the 120 hertz. And even if visually 1080p is fine you still get the great colors and the brightness of the Samsung AMOLED screen and it’s really thin bezels. It’s no big deal watching videos and taking photos and all that stuff is awesome on this screen. However, for the price for a thousand bucks on a flagship in 2020, it’d only be fair and right to get a higher refresh rate screen. Right? Heck, Apple’s iPhone 12 Pro is rumored to get 120 hertz at the same price as this Galaxy.

Note 20配备了一个AMOLED显示屏，但是只有1080p60赫兹，具有一个稍大的打Kong器，用于相同的10兆像素自拍照的切口和下面的相同的超声波指纹读取器。 两款手机都必须经历1080p分辨率，因为Ultra必须调低分辨率才能使用120赫兹。 即使从视觉上看1080p很好，您仍然可以获得三星AMOLED屏幕的出色色彩和亮度，而且边框非常薄。 观看视频和拍照没什么大不了的，所有这些东西在屏幕上都很棒。 然而，对于2020年旗舰店上千美元的价格来说，获得更高的刷新率屏幕是公平和正确的。 对？ 传闻，苹果公司的iPhone 12 Pro可以以与此银河相同的价格获得120赫兹。

用料 (Materials)

The body of this Galaxy is plastic. On phones like the Pixel 4a for example they chose plastic and plastic and that’s okay because glass is more expensive and more fragile and the plastic is cheaper. It’ll work for a $350 phone but if we look at this price which we’ll cover later on, Samsung cutting down the materials doesn’t contribute and justify its value. Even if it does a great job of hiding fingerprints and all the micro scratches that you usually get with plastic.

这个星系的主体是塑料的。 例如，在像Pixel 4a这样的手机上，他们选择了塑料和塑料，这没关系，因为玻璃价格更高，更易碎，并且塑料更便宜。 它可以在350美元的手机上使用，但是如果我们看一下这个价格，稍后再讲，三星削减材料的使用将无济于事并证明其价值。 即使它可以很好地隐藏指纹和塑料通常会产生的所有细微划痕。

摄影机 (Cameras)

The camera array is also cut down as you can see from the significantly smaller camera bump. Instead of the Ultra’s huge 108-megapixel primary camera and the periscope 5x optical zoom, you’re receiving a more reasonable 12-megapixel main camera, 12-megapixel ultra-wide and 64 megapixels 3x zoom. the photos from both galaxies are pretty indistinguishable with one photo having more detail.

从明显较小的相机凸起处可以看到，相机阵列也被削减了。 取代了Ultra庞大的108百万像素主摄像头和潜望镜5倍光学变焦，您将获得更合理的12百万像素主摄像头，12百万像素超广角和64百万像素3倍变焦。 来自两个星系的照片几乎无法区分，其中一张具有更多细节。

More advantages to this system like the not-so-giant sensor focus quickly without even needing laser autofocus but while you have 8K video it also only goes to 30x max unlike the 50x zoom on the Ultra. Though if most people just take a shot with 30x, it’s enough for the “Average-Joe.”

该系统的更多优势，例如不需要那么大的传感器就可以快速对焦，甚至不需要激光自动对焦，但是当您拥有8K视频时，与Ultra的50倍变焦不同，它也只能达到30倍最大。 尽管如果大多数人只用30倍拍摄照片，那对于“ Average-Joe”来说就足够了。

And sure, all of these specs have some problems but there’s not much to hate, right?

当然，所有这些规格都有一些问题，但是没有太多可恨的，对吗？

价格荒谬 (The Price is Preposterous)

The worst part about this phone launch price they picked. $1,000! There is no way this phone should ever justifiably be a thousand dollars out of your pocket. Sure, if you’d remove the branding and the price from this, you’ve got nice specs for something unique. You do get the S-Pen, wireless DeX, and Samsung’s set of features. Then, there isn’t anything out there that quite matches it in terms of features. But for everything you’re getting, it should’ve had a launch price of $700. They even could’ve lowered the chip to a Snapdragon 765g to make it more reasonable. Then the other complaints such as having a plastic body and only having 60 hertz. display would slide. A thousand bucks just don’t feel right. It genuinely feels like Samsung was confused about whether this was to be a premium phone or not. That’s why this messed up.

他们选择的这款手机推出价格最糟糕的部分。 $ 1,000！ 这款手机绝对不可能从口袋里掏出一千美元。 当然，如果您要从中删除品牌和价格，您将拥有一些独特的规格。 您可以获得S笔，无线DeX和三星的功能集。 然后，就功能而言，没有任何与之完全匹配的东西。 但是对于您获得的所有东西，它的发布价格都应该为700美元。 他们甚至可以将芯片降低到Snapdragon 765g，使其更加合理。 然后是其他抱怨，例如有一个塑料的身体，只有60赫兹。 显示会滑动。 一千美元只是感觉不对。 真的感觉像三星对于这是否是高级手机感到困惑。 这就是为什么搞砸了。

The $1,300 Note 20 Ultra is the best deal. In only $300, it fixes all the Note 20’s mistakes such as a 120-hertz screen, better cameras, less S-Pen lag, having a premium glass body, and more. Buy the Ultra.

1300美元的 Note 20 Ultra是最好的选择。 它只需300美元，即可解决所有Note 20的错误，例如120赫兹的屏幕，更好的摄像头，更少的S笔滞后，具有优质的玻璃机身等等。 购买超。

That’s Samsung’s catch.

那是三星的收获。

三星的真实玩 (Samsung’s Real Play)

Samsung wasn’t confused, they knew what they were doing. They used what economists call the “decoy effect.” People’s perception of value is always relative to something. So when you have a similar phone with way fewer features but only at a slightly smaller price — the more expensive phone suddenly appears to be a great deal and worth your wallet. The Note 20 was meant to be inadequate. So its “big brother” is the better one to choose from. Samsung doesn’t expect to sell a lot of Note ’20s. The Note 20 only exists to push people toward the 20 Ultras for profit.

三星并不感到困惑，他们知道自己在做什么。 他们使用了经济学家所谓的“诱饵效应”。 人们对价值的认识总是与某件事有关。 因此，当您拥有功能较少但价格却稍低的类似手机时，价格更高的手机突然看起来非常划算，值得您掏钱包。 说明20不够充分。 因此，它的“老大哥”是更好的选择。 三星预计不会出售大量的Note'20s。 Note 20 仅用于将人们推向20 Ultras以获取利润。

All in all, the Note 20 was meant to be a pawn for more money, not a phone anyone should buy. Even if your eyes are only on the S-Pen, DeX, and the extra year of software updates, it’s just not worth it.

总而言之 ，Note 20旨在成为更多钱的典当，而不是任何人都应该购买的手机。 即使你的眼睛只在S-笔，DEX，和软件更新的这特别的一年，它只是不值得。

About Me; I’m a twelve-year-old funny weird geek who’s passionate about life, electronics, and other stuff.

关于我 ; 我是一个十二岁的有趣怪异怪胎，他对生活，电子产品和其他东西充满热情。

Other TECH Articles written by Me:

我撰写的其他TECH文章：

• Which iPhones are getting discontinued this year (2020)

  今年(2020年)将停售哪些iPhone

• Apple’s iPad 8th Generation- Go Big or Go Home!

  苹果的第8代iPad-变大或变家！

• Trust Intel Macs or Trust ARM Macs

  信任Intel Mac或Trust ARM Mac

• 2020 13" Macbook Pro ($1,799)- Review- The Good, The Bad, The Mac

  2020 13“ Macbook Pro($ 1,799)-评测-The Good，The Bad，The Mac

Interested in Poetry? Latest and the greatest:

对诗歌感兴趣？ 最新和最伟大的：

• Locked Doors.

  锁着的门。