shields 徽标

重点 (Top highlight)

Currently, we are facing such a graphic design phase when a lot of brands use to have very similar logos. More exactly, a lot of brands switched from having proper logos to just having logotypes (logos without a symbol) and with no exception all use sans serif geometric fonts.

当前，当许多品牌使用具有非常相似的徽标时，我们正面临这样的图形设计阶段。更准确地说，许多品牌从具有适当的徽标转换为仅具有徽标(没有符号的徽标)，并且无一例外都使用无衬线几何字体。

I can understand the designers point of view on this matter. For them it is basically a win over that old marketing strategy where you should always design a very unique logo with a symbol in order to be recognizable. Sometimes this is just an impossible mission — all good basic shapes are already taken, even apples. That’s why logos such as Uber or the new rebranded Revolut one, are more than enough for a brand to be successful.

我可以理解设计师在此问题上的观点。对于他们而言，这基本上是对旧营销策略的一次胜利，在该营销策略中，您应始终设计一个带有符号的非常独特的徽标，以使其易于识别。有时这只是一个不可能完成的任务-所有好的基本形状都已经被采用，甚至是苹果。这就是为什么诸如Uber或新的Revolut品牌这样的徽标足以使一个品牌成功。

*Some famous brands which are easily recognizable juts by their symbols: Apple, Dropbox, Nike, Target, Twitter, Maersk, Amazon, Adidas一些知名品牌，其符号易于识别：Apple，Dropbox，Nike，Target，Twitter，马士基，亚马逊，阿迪达斯*

在过去的广告时代，徽标并不是要一起出现 (In the old era of advertising logos weren’t meant to be featured together)

They were designed in the full complexity and used as a central element in the communication.

它们是完全复杂的设计，并用作通信中的核心元素。

However, let’s consider some examples of logos usage today.

但是，让我们考虑一些今天使用徽标的示例。

There are visuals which might contain more logos on them. These can be sponsors logos, event organizers, media partners and so on. It’s not about having a problem on how to place the main logo in the visual, its’ more likely about that situations when more that three logos should stay in a close proximity to each other and how they impact the overall look of this visual.

有些视觉效果上可能包含更多徽标。这些可以是赞助商徽标，活动组织者，媒体合作伙伴等。这与如何将主徽标放置在视觉对象中无关，而更多的情况是当三个以上的徽标应彼此靠近时，以及它们如何影响该视觉对象的整体外观。

Once I was in a situation when I had to add more that 10 logos on a visual for an event. All those being sponsors who payed for this event in order to be promoted. Some places where this visual should appear were really small and with limited space, like some 400x400 px web banners. The problem was that some logos being too complex had a limited visibly if shrieked. And I was in the situation to decide shall I keep the visual at all or just to make a banner full of sponsors logos, of all possible shapes and colors which looked grotesque together despite of the effort to align them nicely.

有一次，当我不得不为某个事件的视觉效果添加超过10个徽标时。所有为这次促销活动付费的赞助商。这些视觉效果应该出现的地方很小，而且空间有限，例如一些400x400 px的网络横幅。问题在于，某些过于复杂的徽标在尖叫时明显受到限制。我当时的情况是要决定是否保留视觉效果，或者只是制作横幅，上面贴满赞助商徽标，所有可能的形状和颜色看起来很怪异，尽管努力使它们对齐。

Another common practice for more logos being featured together is this section on each website which shows who is using their service, like in this example from Intercom:

每个网站上的此部分都显示将徽标一起使用的另一种常见做法，该部分显示谁在使用其服务，例如Intercom的示例：

*Logos featured on* *Intercom* *website*

独特也意味着成为局外人 (Being unique also means being an outsider)

So, what is the point I am trying to make with previously mentioned examples?

那么，我想用前面提到的例子来说明什么呢？

While arranging these logos string each designer is dreaming of an even pattern where the visual balance between all logos is easily achieved. The idea is that the more logos differ from each other, the more harder is to align them optically. There is no such an aligner tool to deal with that. The only good tool designers can count on is their eyes.

在排列这些徽标时，每个设计师都梦想着一种均匀的图案，在该图案中可以轻松实现所有徽标之间的视觉平衡。想法是，徽标彼此之间的差异越多，则将它们光学对齐的难度就越大。没有这样的对齐工具可以解决这个问题。设计师唯一可以依靠的工具就是他们的眼睛。

Even harder — there were times when some logos did not support grayscale and should be used in full color — real nightmare for a designer who want to preserve a color palette of the visual.

更难的是-有时某些徽标不支持灰度并且应全彩色使用-对于想要保留视觉调色板的设计师来说，这真是一场噩梦。

Today being different for a logo is no more a strong point but rather a shame considering how often logos are paired together with other logos instead of having their own solo lives.

今天，徽标的区别不再是优点，而是考虑徽标与其他徽标配对的频率而不是拥有自己的独身生活是一种耻辱。

So, voila — problem solved: all logos nowadays are juts a word, in sans serif, probably made from a bold grotesque typeface. Easy to align, all black and white, looking great together, almost like a big family.

因此，瞧，问题解决了：如今，所有徽标都是用无衬线字体突出的一个单词，无衬线字体，可能是由大胆的怪诞字体制成的。容易对齐，全都是黑色和白色，看起来很棒，几乎就像一个大家庭。

If I would go further, I would expect all brands to decide on capitalization or no of the first letter, because for now it is only thing they seems to not have an agreement about. Also those logotypes which have a dot at the end, what does this dot add to this characterless but well unified logos? The same thing with a small tweak in the main character like Casper or Fluidly have, is this really adding to uniqueness while maintaining similarity with other logos?

如果我走得更远，我希望所有品牌都能决定大写还是首字母大写，因为目前看来，他们似乎尚无共识。还有那些在结尾处带有圆点的徽标，这个圆点会为无字符但统一的徽标增加什么？像卡斯珀(Casper)或Fluidly一样，在主要角色上进行了一些细微调整，这是否真的增加了唯一性，同时又保持了与其他徽标的相似性？

徽标危机 (Logo crisis)

What are other reasons why all logos look similar today?

今天所有徽标看起来相似的其他原因是什么？

It is really hard to come up with a totally new visual element today. Like it was mentioned before all good, simple and recognizable shapes were taken. The apple is taken by Apple, the bird shape is taken by Twitter, a more specific bird bread shape such as dove is taken by..guess whom

shields 徽标_所有徽标看起来都一样相关推荐

shields 徽标_基本徽标设计的简单指南
当您想到徽标时,会想到什么? 一个金色的拱形M,一堆直线和圆,或者仅仅是一个可爱的小形状? 那么,为什么"徽标设计"必须只限于具有各种精美程序知识的高度专业的计算机怪才来完成呢? ...
shields 徽标_到处都有平面徽标
shields 徽标重点 (Top highlight) Companies invest a lot of time, money and energy trying to make audien ...
shields 徽标_符号，标志，文字标记：徽标类型的综合指南
shields 徽标 Designers and non-designers alike struggle with common terminology when talking about bra ...
黑客初学者刷屏技巧_初学者徽标设计技巧
编者注:这篇文章是由Vlad Shvets为Hongkiat.com撰写的. Vlad为内容中提到的Vectr工作. 每个公司,自由职业者或独立专业人士都需要徽标 . 一旦确定是时候成立一家公司, 徽 ...
word把选择答案弄到题目里_一个极限案例弄明白为何“看答案都明白，做题目就是想不起来”...
当前国家对基础学科如此重视的情况下,我们更不能培养出来一些只是记忆题目无法解决具体问题的应试者. 一样的错误前几天遇到一件很有趣的事情,有一道求极限的题目涉及到了公式 q 的 n 次方的极限,本来是 ...
Python函数和面向对象，小白看了都说好
Python函数和面向对象,小白看了都说好 python除了使用内置函数以外,还可以自定义函数.我们为什么要定义和使用函数呢? 下面我举个例子,比如我想求10的阶乘 # 求10的阶乘 m = 1 fo ...
狗看了都流泪的Mask-RCNN
目录准备数据集: 标注: 将json转换成dataset文件: 将labelme_json中所有的文件归类: mask掩码归类: maskRCNN: 配置要求: 将 ipynb 转 py,查看官方模 ...
习惯了等待的伤感QQ日志_散了，回忆都淡了
习惯了等待的伤感QQ日志_散了,回忆都淡了 - 习惯了等待的伤感QQ日志_散了,回忆都淡了人,很可能在初恋失败的那一刻,或年轻丧偶的那一天,便已经把自己一生的爱,跟着埋葬.剩下的只是身体,在人间过着 ...
算法训练审美课（《审美的历程》课上有n位学生，帅老师展示了m幅画，其中有些是梵高的作品，另外的都出自五岁小朋友之手。老师请同学们分辨哪些画的作者是梵高，但是老师自己并没有答案，因为这些画看上去都像）
问题描述 <审美的历程>课上有n位学生,帅老师展示了m幅画,其中有些是梵高的作品,另外的都出自五岁小朋友之手.老师请同学们分辨哪些画的作者是梵高,但是老师自己并没有答案,因为这些画看上去都 ...

shields 徽标_所有徽标看起来都一样

重点 (Top highlight)

在过去的广告时代，徽标并不是要一起出现 (In the old era of advertising logos weren’t meant to be featured together)

独特也意味着成为局外人 (Being unique also means being an outsider)

徽标危机 (Logo crisis)

shields 徽标_所有徽标看起来都一样相关推荐

最新文章

热门文章