MPLS ××× 网络中的OSPF Sham-Link
实验拓扑图
实验描述:如上图所示,现PE-R1、P-R2、PE-R3为MPLS ×××网络,两CE客户需要通过MPLS ×××骨干网络进行通信,并且CE-R4与CE-R6之间有一条链路作为备份链路,正常情况要,R4至R6的流量通过MPLS ×××网络走,当MPLS ×××网络存在故障时,通过R4与R6之间的互联链路走,下面配置OSPF Sham-Link实现上述要求。
1、首先配置MP-BGP,MPLS,VRF,PE与CE的OSPF路由协议
PE-R1的配置:
R1#show runn
ip vrf Mao
rd 100:10
route-target export 100:10
route-target import 100:11
!
ip cef
mpls label range 100 199
interface Loopback0
ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.255
!
interface FastEthernet0/0
ip vrf forwarding Mao
ip address 14.1.1.1 255.255.255.252
interface FastEthernet1/0
ip address 12.1.1.1 255.255.255.252
mpls ip
router ospf 2 vrf Mao
redistribute bgp 100 subnets
network 14.1.1.0 0.0.0.3 area 1
!
router ospf 1
router-id 1.1.1.1
network 1.1.1.1 0.0.0.0 area 0
network 12.1.1.0 0.0.0.3 area 0
!
router bgp 100
bgp log-neighbor-changes
no bgp default ipv4-unicast
neighbor 3.3.3.3 remote-as 100
neighbor 3.3.3.3 update-source Loopback0
!
address-family ***v4
neighbor 3.3.3.3 activate
neighbor 3.3.3.3 send-community extended
exit-address-family
!
address-family ipv4 vrf Mao
redistribute ospf 2 match internal external 1 external 2
exit-address-family
P-R2配置:
ip cef
mpls label range 200 299
interface Loopback0
ip address 2.2.2.2 255.255.255.255
interface FastEthernet0/0
ip address 12.1.1.2 255.255.255.252
mpls ip
interface FastEthernet0/1
ip address 23.1.1.1 255.255.255.252
mpls ip
router ospf 1
router-id 2.2.2.2
network 2.2.2.2 0.0.0.0 area 0
network 12.1.1.0 0.0.0.3 area 0
network 23.1.1.0 0.0.0.3 area 0
PE-R3配置:
R3#show runn
ip vrf Mao
rd 100:10
route-target export 100:11
route-target import 100:10
ip cef
mpls label range 300 399
!
interface Loopback0
ip address 3.3.3.3 255.255.255.255
!
interface FastEthernet0/0
ip address 23.1.1.2 255.255.255.252
mpls ip
!
interface FastEthernet0/1
ip vrf forwarding Mao
ip address 36.1.1.1 255.255.255.252
!
router ospf 2 vrf Mao
redistribute bgp 100 subnets
network 36.1.1.0 0.0.0.3 area 1
!
router ospf 1
router-id 3.3.3.3
network 3.3.3.3 0.0.0.0 area 0
network 23.1.1.0 0.0.0.3 area 0
!
router bgp 100
bgp log-neighbor-changes
no bgp default ipv4-unicast
neighbor 1.1.1.1 remote-as 100
neighbor 1.1.1.1 update-source Loopback0
!
address-family ***v4
neighbor 1.1.1.1 activate
neighbor 1.1.1.1 send-community extended
exit-address-family
!
address-family ipv4 vrf Mao
redistribute ospf 2 match internal external 1 external 2
exit-address-family
CE-R4的配置:
interface Loopback0
ip address 4.4.4.4 255.255.255.255
!
interface FastEthernet0/0
ip address 14.1.1.2 255.255.255.252
interface FastEthernet0/1
ip address 46.1.1.1 255.255.255.252
!
router ospf 10
router-id 4.4.4.4
network 4.4.4.4 0.0.0.0 area 1
network 14.1.1.0 0.0.0.3 area 1
network 46.1.1.0 0.0.0.3 area 1
CE-R6的配置:
interface Loopback0
ip address 6.6.6.6 255.255.255.255
!
interface FastEthernet0/0
ip address 36.1.1.2 255.255.255.252
interface FastEthernet0/1
ip address 46.1.1.2 255.255.255.252
router ospf 2
router-id 6.6.6.6
network 6.6.6.6 0.0.0.0 area 1
network 36.1.1.0 0.0.0.3 area 1
network 46.1.1.0 0.0.0.3 area 1
2、CE端路由情况分析
查看CE端路由情况
R4#show ip route
4.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets
C 4.4.4.4 is directly connected, Loopback0
6.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets
O 6.6.6.6 [110/2] via 46.1.1.2, 00:10:24, FastEthernet0/1
14.0.0.0/8 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks
C 14.1.1.0/30 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/0
L 14.1.1.2/32 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/0
36.0.0.0/30 is subnetted, 1 subnets
O 36.1.1.0 [110/2] via 46.1.1.2, 00:10:24, FastEthernet0/1
46.0.0.0/8 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks
C 46.1.1.0/30 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/1
L 46.1.1.1/32 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/1
从CE-R4看到6.6.6.6路由为区域内路由,是由于CE-R4与CE-R6之间互联的线路运行OSPF,并且在区域1中,而从MPLS ×××骨干网络中传过来的6.6.6.6路由为区域间路由;而OSPF的选路原则是区域内路由优于区域间路由;
在PE-R1上查看×××V4路由,也可以看到6.6.6.6的路由,下一跳指向的是CE-R4,如下:
R1#show ip bgp ***v4 all
Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path
Route Distinguisher: 100:10 (default for vrf Mao)
* i 4.4.4.4/32 3.3.3.3 3 100 0 ?
*> 14.1.1.2 2 32768 ?
*> 6.6.6.6/32 14.1.1.2 3 32768 ?
* i 3.3.3.3 2 100 0 ?
* i 14.1.1.0/30 3.3.3.3 3 100 0 ?
*> 0.0.0.0 0 32768 ?
*> 36.1.1.0/30 14.1.1.2 3 32768 ?
* i 3.3.3.3 0 100 0 ?
*> 46.1.1.0/30 14.1.1.2 2 32768 ?
* i 3.3.3.3 2 100 0 ?
R1#show ip route vrf Mao
4.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets
O 4.4.4.4 [110/2] via 14.1.1.2, 00:40:39, FastEthernet0/0
6.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets
O 6.6.6.6 [110/3] via 14.1.1.2, 00:23:00, FastEthernet0/0
14.0.0.0/8 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks
C 14.1.1.0/30 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/0
L 14.1.1.1/32 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/0
36.0.0.0/30 is subnetted, 1 subnets
O 36.1.1.0 [110/3] via 14.1.1.2, 00:23:00, FastEthernet0/0
46.0.0.0/30 is subnetted, 1 subnets
O 46.1.1.0 [110/2] via 14.1.1.2, 00:23:00, FastEthernet0/0
当将CE-R4与CE-R6互联的线路shutdown后,查看R4的路由如下:
R4(config)#int fa0/1
R4(config-if)#shutdown
R4#show ip route
4.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets
C 4.4.4.4 is directly connected, Loopback0
6.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets
O IA 6.6.6.6 [110/3] via 14.1.1.1, 00:00:52, FastEthernet0/0
14.0.0.0/8 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks
C 14.1.1.0/30 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/0
L 14.1.1.2/32 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/0
36.0.0.0/30 is subnetted, 1 subnets
O IA 36.1.1.0 [110/2] via 14.1.1.1, 00:00:52, FastEthernet0/0
46.0.0.0/30 is subnetted, 1 subnets
O IA 46.1.1.0 [110/3] via 14.1.1.1, 00:00:52, FastEthernet0/0
现在看到的路由是区域间路由,是PE-R1传过来的,为实现网络的可靠性,正常情况下,R4与R6之间的链路是备份线路,平时数据通过MPLS ×××传递,为实现上述R4路由输出情况,现在在PE路由器之间配置Sham-Link实现两CE端日常数据通过MPLS ×××网络传递,当MPLS ×××网络出现故障时,数据流量切换至R4与R6的互联线路,以便不影响两CE端的互访。
3、Sham-Link配置
R1(config)#int loo 11 //用于建立OSPF Sham-Link
R1(config-if)#ip vrf forwarding Mao
R1(config-if)#ip add 11.1.1.1 255.255.255.255
R1(config)#router bgp 100
R1(config-router)#address-family ipv4 vrf Mao
R1(config-router-af)#network 11.1.1.1 mask 255.255.255.255 //将其发布至MP-BGP中
R1(config)#router ospf 2 vrf Mao
R1(config-router)#area 1 sham-link 11.1.1.1 33.1.1.1 cost 5 //创建sham-link
R3(config)#int loo 33
R3(config-if)#ip vrf forwarding Mao
R3(config-if)#ip add 33.1.1.1 255.255.255.255
R3(config)#router bgp 100
R3(config-router)#address-family ipv4 vrf Mao
R3(config-router-af)#network 33.1.1.1 mask 255.255.255.255
R3(config)#router ospf 2 vrf Mao
R3(config-router)#area 1 sham-link 33.1.1.1 11.1.1.1 cost 5
查看其邻居是否建立成功,可用show ip ospf neighbor或者show ip ospf sham-link
R3#show ip ospf neighbor
Neighbor ID Pri State Dead Time Address Interface
2.2.2.2 1 FULL/BDR 00:00:36 23.1.1.1 FastEthernet0/0
14.1.1.1 0 FULL/ - 00:00:30 11.1.1.1 OSPF_SL0
6.6.6.6 1 FULL/DR 00:00:36 36.1.1.2 FastEthernet0/1
R3#show ip ospf sham-links
Sham Link OSPF_SL0 to address 11.1.1.1 is up
Area 1 source address 33.1.1.1
Run as demand circuit
DoNotAge LSA allowed. Cost of using 5 State POINT_TO_POINT,
Timer intervals configured, Hello 10, Dead 40, Wait 40,
Hello due in 00:00:04
Adjacency State FULL (Hello suppressed)
Index 2/2, retransmission queue length 0, number of retransmission 0
First 0x0(0)/0x0(0) Next 0x0(0)/0x0(0)
Last retransmission scan length is 0, maximum is 0
Last retransmission scan time is 0 msec, maximum is 0 msec
4、Sham-link配置分析及结果分析
上面sham-link的配置设置了cost值为5,那么PE-PE之间这条sham-link的开销值就为5,此时查看R4上的路由,6.6.6.6的路由下一跳还是直接指向R6,并没有走MPLS ×××网络。
R4#show ip route
4.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets
C 4.4.4.4 is directly connected, Loopback0
6.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets
O 6.6.6.6 [110/2] via 46.1.1.2, 00:13:09, FastEthernet0/1
11.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets
O E2 11.1.1.1 [110/1] via 14.1.1.1, 00:10:07, FastEthernet0/0
14.0.0.0/8 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks
C 14.1.1.0/30 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/0
L 14.1.1.2/32 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/0
33.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets
O E2 33.1.1.1 [110/1] via 14.1.1.1, 00:09:31, FastEthernet0/0
36.0.0.0/30 is subnetted, 1 subnets
O 36.1.1.0 [110/2] via 46.1.1.2, 00:13:09, FastEthernet0/1
46.0.0.0/8 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks
C 46.1.1.0/30 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/1
L 46.1.1.1/32 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/1
查看R1上的bgp ***v4 6.6.6.6的路由情况
R1#show ip bgp ***v4 all 6.6.6.6
BGP routing table entry for 100:10:6.6.6.6/32, version 43
Paths: (2 available, best #1, table Mao)
Advertised to update-groups:
1
Refresh Epoch 1
Local
14.1.1.2 from 0.0.0.0 (1.1.1.1) //来至CE-R4,并且是最优
Origin incomplete, metric 3, localpref 100, weight 32768, valid, sourced, best
Extended Community: RT:100:10 OSPF DOMAIN ID:0x0005:0x000000020200
OSPF RT:0.0.0.1:2:0 OSPF ROUTER ID:14.1.1.1:0
mpls labels in/out 108/nolabel
rx pathid: 0, tx pathid: 0x0
Refresh Epoch 1
Local
3.3.3.3 (metric 3) from 3.3.3.3 (3.3.3.3) //来至PE-R3,不是最优的
Origin incomplete, metric 2, localpref 100, valid, internal //metric 为2
Extended Community: RT:100:11 OSPF DOMAIN ID:0x0005:0x000000020200
OSPF RT:0.0.0.1:2:0 OSPF ROUTER ID:36.1.1.1:0
mpls labels in/out 108/307
rx pathid: 0, tx pathid: 0
从上述路由输出分析可知,R6直接传给R4(之间互联线路)的6.6.6.6的路由,其OSPF开销值为2;而从MPLS ×××网络经PE-R3传至PE-R1的6.6.6.6路由的开销值为2,如果传递至R4,那么开销值为8(5+2+1),其值大于R6直接传给R4的开销值,因此R6直接传给R4的6.6.6.6的路由将会加入路由表项,因此在R4的路由表中将会看到6.6.6.6的下一跳还是指向46.1.1.2。
要想实现两CE端互访通过MPLS ×××网络,可以修改COST值来实现,现修改R4与R6互联接口的ospf cost值;
R4(config)#int fa0/1
R4(config-if)#ip ospf cost 10 将其cost值设置大于通过MPLS ×××的cost值
R6(config)#int fa0/1
R6(config-if)#ip ospf cost 10
现在R4上查看路由表情况
R4#show ip route
4.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets
C 4.4.4.4 is directly connected, Loopback0
6.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets
O 6.6.6.6 [110/8] via 14.1.1.1, 00:25:30, FastEthernet0/0 //下一跳指向PE-R1
11.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets
O E2 11.1.1.1 [110/1] via 14.1.1.1, 00:44:40, FastEthernet0/0
14.0.0.0/8 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks
C 14.1.1.0/30 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/0
L 14.1.1.2/32 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/0
33.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets
O E2 33.1.1.1 [110/1] via 14.1.1.1, 00:44:04, FastEthernet0/0
36.0.0.0/30 is subnetted, 1 subnets
O 36.1.1.0 [110/7] via 14.1.1.1, 00:25:30, FastEthernet0/0
46.0.0.0/8 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks
C 46.1.1.0/30 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/1
L 46.1.1.1/32 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/1
测试:
R4#traceroute 6.6.6.6
Type escape sequence to abort.
Tracing the route to 6.6.6.6
VRF info: (vrf in name/id, vrf out name/id)
1 14.1.1.1 136 msec 84 msec 92 msec
2 12.1.1.2 [MPLS: Labels 201/307 Exp 0] 140 msec 124 msec 144 msec
3 36.1.1.1 [MPLS: Label 307 Exp 0] 120 msec 112 msec 60 msec
4 36.1.1.2 156 msec 168 msec 112 msec
//307为MP-BGP分配的内层标签
5、总结
配置sham-link时要根据CE端备份链路所在区域来配置所属区域,如果配置其它区域,该PE发布的至CE端路由将会变成区域间路由,优先级低于区域内路由,因此需要将sham-link配置与备份链路所属区域在同一区域中。如果两CE端没有备份链路,也就不需要配置sham-link链路了。
在调整CE端的选路时,需要根据sham-link配置的COST值及备份链路的接口cost值来完成。
转载于:https://blog.51cto.com/muyun/1584754
MPLS ××× 网络中的OSPF Sham-Link相关推荐
- 在NBMA网络中配置OSPF
在NBMA网络中配置OSPF 在NBMA网络中配置OSPF协议和调整属性,可以灵活组建OSPF网络. 文章目录 在NBMA网络中配置OSPF 一.应用环境 二.前置任务 三.配置NBMA 1.修改OS ...
- 标签在MPLS网络中的功能—Vecloud
多协议标签交换(MPLS)将路由网络转换为更接近交换网络的网络.代替逐跳地转发分组,而是为特定的源-目的地对建立路径.这些预定路径称为标签交换路径(LSP).组成标签交换网络的路由器称为标签交换路由器 ...
- pc双网卡实现路由转发_路由器配置骨干网设备MPLS本地会话功能实现数据在MPLS网络中转发...
一.组网需求: 如图所示,LSRA.LSRB.LSRC是MPLS网络的核心设备.数据流量从PE设备进入MPLS网络.要实现数据流在MPLS域内的转发,则需要在LSRA.LSRB.LSRC之间配置LDP ...
- 路由交换技术实战七 FR 网络中配置 OSPF( 完成版 )
帧中继网络用户接口上最多可支持1024条虚电路,其中用户可用的dlci范围是:16-1007 DLCI只具有局部意义,即交换机上不同的端口可以使用相同的DLCI号. 实验要求: 1.掌握配置帧中继的基 ...
- NBMA网络中的OSPF实验(MGRE)
NBMA(MGRE)OSPF实验 实验拓扑 实验要求 ①ISP只能配IP地址,PC1-5在私有网段,R6的环回在公有网段 ②R1/4/5为全连结构的MGRE:R1/2/3为星型的MGRE,其中R1为中 ...
- 11.4 OSPF在帧中继网络中的配置
原理概述 OSPF将网络分为4种不同的类型,即Point-to-Point.Broadcast.NBMA 及Point-to-MultiPoint,不同网络类型下OSPF的工作制不一样.比如在Broa ...
- Ospf在广播网络中建立邻居关系的详细过程
Ospf 在广播网络中建立邻居关系的详细过程 目的:观察在广播网络中,OSPF建立邻接关系的过程 拓扑及设备需求 拓扑: 图片1 设备需求:3台路由器,ios版本为12.2 需求:配置3台路由器的以太 ...
- 大型网络中内部网关路由协议(IGP)的选择
众多Internet服务提供商在自治域系统(Autonomous System)间普遍使用外部网关路由协议-BGP(Border Gateway Protocol) Version 4,然而在自治域系 ...
- 传统IP网络与MPLS网络转发的区别
MPLS VS IP转发原理 1.IP转发原理 路由器查看数据包的目的IP地址,根据路由表来转发数据.IP 网络,根据IP包头转发数据.IP的逐跳转发,在经过的每一跳处,必须进行路由表的最长匹配查找( ...
最新文章
- 多个servlet配制方法
- python新手教程 从零开始-Python零基础从零开始学习Python十分钟快速入门
- PCA与LDA算法的解释,浅显易懂
- 94. Binary Tree Inorder Traversal 二叉树的中序遍历
- 承博士:让云计算落地生根的中国云计算平台
- 10元一瓶的普通白酒和2000元一瓶的茅台酒有什么区别?
- 浅谈Java中的栈和堆
- VBS 代码合集(慎用,好玩)
- NVIDIA更新驱动之后,NVIDIA控制面板消失不见的解决办法
- (转)关于电子书格式比较
- java---抽奖小程序
- android 5.0 n,EMUI 5.0遭泄漏 基于Android N制作!华为P9用户有福啦
- 2020 mse 清华_家长们看过来!2020年下半年剑桥MSE考试备考全攻略!
- html纵向时间轴代码,垂直时间轴HTML
- 回环检测之DBoW2
- 如何生成smali文件
- Linux系统不响应SYN包的解决办法
- NLP(自然语言处理) - Tricks Dataset 集合
- 北京大学肖臻老师《区块链技术与应用》公开课笔记:以太坊原理(一):以太坊概述、账户、状态树、交易树和收据树
- 2004年高考数学压轴题(利用对数齐次化或主元法解决)
热门文章
- 迷你更新后显示连接服务器出现问题,迷你版连接云服务器异常
- mysql里字典是什么意思_mysql常用字典表(完整版)
- 27.python-网路-tcp
- 太酷了!滴滴的这个黑科技,面世了!!!
- arcgis中欧氏距离操作_ArcGIS教程:欧氏距离 (空间分析)
- 计算机思维在音乐中的应用,“思维导图”在音乐理论教育中的应用.doc
- 项目一 认识Linux 操作系统
- 字体图标库-icomoon的使用方法
- Cesnsjajsjsj
- InstallShield 2010 SP1发布(posted @ 2009-10-14)