sql exists用法_新同事不讲武德,这SQL语句写得忒野了
1. LIMIT 语句
分页查询是最常用的场景之一,但也通常也是最容易出问题的地方。比如对于下面简单的语句,一般DBA想到的办法是在type, name, create_time字段上加组合索引。这样条件排序都能有效的利用到索引,性能迅速提升。
SELECT * FROM operation WHERE type = 'SQLStats' AND name = 'SlowLog' ORDER BY create_time LIMIT 1000, 10;
好吧,可能90%以上的DBA解决该问题就到此为止。但当 LIMIT 子句变成 “LIMIT 1000000,10” 时,程序员仍然会抱怨:我只取10条记录为什么还是慢?
要知道数据库也并不知道第1000000条记录从什么地方开始,即使有索引也需要从头计算一次。出现这种性能问题,多数情形下是程序员偷懒了。在前端数据浏览翻页,或者大数据分批导出等场景下,是可以将上一页的最大值当成参数作为查询条件的。SQL重新设计如下:
SELECT * FROM operation WHERE type = 'SQLStats' AND name = 'SlowLog' AND create_time > '2017-03-16 14:00:00' ORDER BY create_time limit 10;
在新设计下查询时间基本固定,不会随着数据量的增长而发生变化。
2. 隐式转换
SQL语句中查询变量和字段定义类型不匹配是另一个常见的错误。比如下面的语句:
mysql> explain extended SELECT * > FROM my_balance b > WHERE b.bpn = 14000000123 > AND b.isverified IS NULL ;mysql> show warnings;| Warning | 1739 | Cannot use ref access on index 'bpn' due to type or collation conversion on field 'bpn'
其中字段bpn的定义为varchar(20),MySQL的策略是将字符串转换为数字之后再比较。函数作用于表字段,索引失效。
上述情况可能是应用程序框架自动填入的参数,而不是程序员的原意。现在应用框架很多很繁杂,使用方便的同时也小心它可能给自己挖坑。
3. 关联更新、删除
虽然MySQL5.6引入了物化特性,但需要特别注意它目前仅仅针对查询语句的优化。对于更新或删除需要手工重写成JOIN。
比如下面UPDATE语句,MySQL实际执行的是循环/嵌套子查询(DEPENDENT SUBQUERY),其执行时间可想而知。
UPDATE operation o SET status = 'applying' WHERE o.id IN (SELECT id FROM (SELECT o.id, o.status FROM operation o WHERE o.group = 123 AND o.status NOT IN ( 'done' ) ORDER BY o.parent, o.id LIMIT 1) t);
执行计划:
+----+--------------------+-------+-------+---------------+---------+---------+-------+------+-----------------------------------------------------+| id | select_type | table | type | possible_keys | key | key_len | ref | rows | Extra |+----+--------------------+-------+-------+---------------+---------+---------+-------+------+-----------------------------------------------------+| 1 | PRIMARY | o | index | | PRIMARY | 8 | | 24 | Using where; Using temporary || 2 | DEPENDENT SUBQUERY | | | | | | | | Impossible WHERE noticed after reading const tables || 3 | DERIVED | o | ref | idx_2,idx_5 | idx_5 | 8 | const | 1 | Using where; Using filesort |+----+--------------------+-------+-------+---------------+---------+---------+-------+------+-----------------------------------------------------+
重写为JOIN之后,子查询的选择模式从DEPENDENT SUBQUERY变成DERIVED,执行速度大大加快,从7秒降低到2毫秒。
UPDATE operation o JOIN (SELECT o.id, o.status FROM operation o WHERE o.group = 123 AND o.status NOT IN ( 'done' ) ORDER BY o.parent, o.id LIMIT 1) t ON o.id = t.id SET status = 'applying'
执行计划简化为:
+----+-------------+-------+------+---------------+-------+---------+-------+------+-----------------------------------------------------+| id | select_type | table | type | possible_keys | key | key_len | ref | rows | Extra |+----+-------------+-------+------+---------------+-------+---------+-------+------+-----------------------------------------------------+| 1 | PRIMARY | | | | | | | | Impossible WHERE noticed after reading const tables || 2 | DERIVED | o | ref | idx_2,idx_5 | idx_5 | 8 | const | 1 | Using where; Using filesort |+----+-------------+-------+------+---------------+-------+---------+-------+------+-----------------------------------------------------+
4. 混合排序
MySQL不能利用索引进行混合排序。但在某些场景,还是有机会使用特殊方法提升性能的。
SELECT * FROM my_order o INNER JOIN my_appraise a ON a.orderid = o.id ORDER BY a.is_reply ASC, a.appraise_time DESC LIMIT 0, 20
执行计划显示为全表扫描:
+----+-------------+-------+--------+-------------+---------+---------+---------------+---------+-+| id | select_type | table | type | possible_keys | key | key_len | ref | rows | Extra +----+-------------+-------+--------+-------------+---------+---------+---------------+---------+-+| 1 | SIMPLE | a | ALL | idx_orderid | NULL | NULL | NULL | 1967647 | Using filesort || 1 | SIMPLE | o | eq_ref | PRIMARY | PRIMARY | 122 | a.orderid | 1 | NULL |+----+-------------+-------+--------+---------+---------+---------+-----------------+---------+-+
由于is_reply只有0和1两种状态,我们按照下面的方法重写后,执行时间从1.58秒降低到2毫秒。
SELECT * FROM ((SELECT * FROM my_order o INNER JOIN my_appraise a ON a.orderid = o.id AND is_reply = 0 ORDER BY appraise_time DESC LIMIT 0, 20) UNION ALL (SELECT * FROM my_order o INNER JOIN my_appraise a ON a.orderid = o.id AND is_reply = 1 ORDER BY appraise_time DESC LIMIT 0, 20)) t ORDER BY is_reply ASC, appraisetime DESC LIMIT 20;
5. EXISTS语句
MySQL对待EXISTS子句时,仍然采用嵌套子查询的执行方式。如下面的SQL语句:
SELECT *FROM my_neighbor n LEFT JOIN my_neighbor_apply sra ON n.id = sra.neighbor_id AND sra.user_id = 'xxx' WHERE n.topic_status 4 AND EXISTS(SELECT 1 FROM message_info m WHERE n.id = m.neighbor_id AND m.inuser = 'xxx') AND n.topic_type <> 5
执行计划为:
+----+--------------------+-------+------+-----+------------------------------------------+---------+-------+---------+ -----+| id | select_type | table | type | possible_keys | key | key_len | ref | rows | Extra |+----+--------------------+-------+------+ -----+------------------------------------------+---------+-------+---------+ -----+| 1 | PRIMARY | n | ALL | | NULL | NULL | NULL | 1086041 | Using where || 1 | PRIMARY | sra | ref | | idx_user_id | 123 | const | 1 | Using where || 2 | DEPENDENT SUBQUERY | m | ref | | idx_message_info | 122 | const | 1 | Using index condition; Using where |+----+--------------------+-------+------+ -----+------------------------------------------+---------+-------+---------+ -----+
去掉exists更改为join,能够避免嵌套子查询,将执行时间从1.93秒降低为1毫秒。
SELECT *FROM my_neighbor n INNER JOIN message_info m ON n.id = m.neighbor_id AND m.inuser = 'xxx' LEFT JOIN my_neighbor_apply sra ON n.id = sra.neighbor_id AND sra.user_id = 'xxx' WHERE n.topic_status 4 AND n.topic_type <> 5
新的执行计划:
+----+-------------+-------+--------+ -----+------------------------------------------+---------+ -----+------+ -----+| id | select_type | table | type | possible_keys | key | key_len | ref | rows | Extra |+----+-------------+-------+--------+ -----+------------------------------------------+---------+ -----+------+ -----+| 1 | SIMPLE | m | ref | | idx_message_info | 122 | const | 1 | Using index condition || 1 | SIMPLE | n | eq_ref | | PRIMARY | 122 | ighbor_id | 1 | Using where || 1 | SIMPLE | sra | ref | | idx_user_id | 123 | const | 1 | Using where |+----+-------------+-------+--------+ -----+------------------------------------------+---------+ -----+------+ -----+
6. 条件下推
外部查询条件不能够下推到复杂的视图或子查询的情况有:
- 聚合子查询;
- 含有LIMIT的子查询;
- UNION 或UNION ALL子查询;
- 输出字段中的子查询;
如下面的语句,从执行计划可以看出其条件作用于聚合子查询之后:
SELECT * FROM (SELECT target, Count(*) FROM operation GROUP BY target) t WHERE target = 'rm-xxxx' +----+-------------+------------+-------+---------------+-------------+---------+-------+------+-------------+| id | select_type | table | type | possible_keys | key | key_len | ref | rows | Extra |+----+-------------+------------+-------+---------------+-------------+---------+-------+------+-------------+| 1 | PRIMARY | | ref | | | 514 | const | 2 | Using where || 2 | DERIVED | operation | index | idx_4 | idx_4 | 519 | NULL | 20 | Using index |+----+-------------+------------+-------+---------------+-------------+---------+-------+------+-------------+
确定从语义上查询条件可以直接下推后,重写如下:
SELECT target, Count(*) FROM operation WHERE target = 'rm-xxxx' GROUP BY target
执行计划变为:
+----+-------------+-----------+------+---------------+-------+---------+-------+------+--------------------+| id | select_type | table | type | possible_keys | key | key_len | ref | rows | Extra |+----+-------------+-----------+------+---------------+-------+---------+-------+------+--------------------+| 1 | SIMPLE | operation | ref | idx_4 | idx_4 | 514 | const | 1 | Using where; Using index |+----+-------------+-----------+------+---------------+-------+---------+-------+------+--------------------+
7. 提前缩小范围
先上初始SQL语句:
SELECT * FROM my_order o LEFT JOIN my_userinfo u ON o.uid = u.uid LEFT JOIN my_productinfo p ON o.pid = p.pid WHERE ( o.display = 0 ) AND ( o.ostaus = 1 ) ORDER BY o.selltime DESC LIMIT 0, 15
该SQL语句原意是:先做一系列的左连接,然后排序取前15条记录。从执行计划也可以看出,最后一步估算排序记录数为90万,时间消耗为12秒。
+----+-------------+-------+--------+---------------+---------+---------+-----------------+--------+----------------------------------------------------+| id | select_type | table | type | possible_keys | key | key_len | ref | rows | Extra |+----+-------------+-------+--------+---------------+---------+---------+-----------------+--------+----------------------------------------------------+| 1 | SIMPLE | o | ALL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | 909119 | Using where; Using temporary; Using filesort || 1 | SIMPLE | u | eq_ref | PRIMARY | PRIMARY | 4 | o.uid | 1 | NULL || 1 | SIMPLE | p | ALL | PRIMARY | NULL | NULL | NULL | 6 | Using where; Using join buffer (Block Nested Loop) |+----+-------------+-------+--------+---------------+---------+---------+-----------------+--------+----------------------------------------------------+
由于最后WHERE条件以及排序均针对最左主表,因此可以先对my_order排序提前缩小数据量再做左连接。SQL重写后如下,执行时间缩小为1毫秒左右。
SELECT * FROM (SELECT * FROM my_order o WHERE ( o.display = 0 ) AND ( o.ostaus = 1 ) ORDER BY o.selltime DESC LIMIT 0, 15) o LEFT JOIN my_userinfo u ON o.uid = u.uid LEFT JOIN my_productinfo p ON o.pid = p.pid ORDER BY o.selltime DESClimit 0, 15
再检查执行计划:子查询物化后(select_type=DERIVED)参与JOIN。虽然估算行扫描仍然为90万,但是利用了索引以及LIMIT 子句后,实际执行时间变得很小。
+----+-------------+------------+--------+---------------+---------+---------+-------+--------+----------------------------------------------------+| id | select_type | table | type | possible_keys | key | key_len | ref | rows | Extra |+----+-------------+------------+--------+---------------+---------+---------+-------+--------+----------------------------------------------------+| 1 | PRIMARY | | ALL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | 15 | Using temporary; Using filesort || 1 | PRIMARY | u | eq_ref | PRIMARY | PRIMARY | 4 | o.uid | 1 | NULL || 1 | PRIMARY | p | ALL | PRIMARY | NULL | NULL | NULL | 6 | Using where; Using join buffer (Block Nested Loop) || 2 | DERIVED | o | index | NULL | idx_1 | 5 | NULL | 909112 | Using where |+----+-------------+------------+--------+---------------+---------+---------+-------+--------+----------------------------------------------------+
往期资源回顾 需要可自取
- Java基础核心知识大总结.pdf 下载
- 68道C/C++常见面试题(含答案)下载
- Java后端开发学习路线+知识点总结
- 前端开发学习路线+知识点总结
- 大数据开发学习路线+知识点总结
- C/C++开发(后台)学习路线+知识点总结
- 嵌入式开发学习路线+知识点总结
每天进步一点点
慢一点才能更快
sql exists用法_新同事不讲武德,这SQL语句写得忒野了相关推荐
- 新同事不讲武德,这接口测试玩得忒野了
当想找一份测试工程师工作的你,点开招聘网站上各大公司的岗位要求时,发现接口测试已经成为测试招聘中的一项必备技能,没错,它是每个测试从业人员必须掌握的知识,接口测试实施在多系统多平台的构架下,有着极为高 ...
- select into from 用法_年轻同事不讲武德,直接怼上MySQL常见SQL的七大错误用法
今天来分享几个MySQL常见的SQL错误(不当)用法.我们在作为一个初学者时,很有可能自己在写SQL时也没有注意到这些问题,导致写出来的SQL语句效率低下,所以我们也可以自省自检一下. 常见SQL错误 ...
- azure不支持哪些语句 sql_新同事不讲武德,这SQL语句写得忒野了
前言 MySQL在去年年仍然保持强劲的数据库流行度增长趋势.越来越多的客户将自己的应用建立在MySQL数据库之上,甚至是从Oracle迁移到MySQL上来.但也存在部分客户在使用MySQL数据库的过程 ...
- 新同事不讲武德,这SQL语句写得忒野了
来源 | developer.aliyun.com/article/72501 整理来自:CodeSheep 今天来分享几个MySQL常见的SQL错误(不当)用法.我们在作为一个初学者时,很有可能自己 ...
- 新同事不讲武德,乱写 SQL 偷袭我!!
来源:yq.aliyun.com/articles/72501 今天来分享几个MySQL常见的SQL错误(不当)用法.我们在作为一个初学者时,很有可能自己在写SQL时也没有注意到这些问题,导致写出来的 ...
- java sql update用法_使用if else条件将SQL UPDATE语句转换为php(codeigniter)
condition 3: a. LAMA 和 ESTIMASI 均为空 . b. LAMA 为空 c. ESTIMASI 为空 如果要根据 LAMA 和 ESTIMASI 的值更新表中的所有行,可以使 ...
- mysql 索引巧用,SQL语句写得忒野了
今天来分享几个MySQL常见的SQL错误**(不当)用法.我们在作为一个初学者时,很有可能自己在写SQL时也没有注意到这些问题,导致写出来的SQL语句效率低下,所以我们也可以自省自检一下. 1. LI ...
- sql not exists用法_牛客网数据库SQL实战详细剖析(5160)(更新完结)
文章来源:大数据肌肉猿 作者:无精疯 这是一个系列文章,总共61题,分6期,有答案以及解题思路,并附上解题的一个思考过程. 具体题目可参考牛客网的SQL实战模块: https://www.nowcod ...
- cass道路道路设计参数文件命令为什么没反应_面试官不讲武德问我:为什么MySQL不建议使用delete删除数据?
有情怀,有干货,微信搜索[三太子敖丙]关注这个不一样的程序员. 本文 GitHub https://github.com/JavaFamily 已收录,有一线大厂面试完整考点.资料以及我的系列文章. ...
最新文章
- Android中修改弹出dialog背景无色透明,弹出时有遮罩
- cpp_extension dist must be a Distribution instance
- [原创] Matlab 指派问题模型代码
- layui 自定义排序_thinkphp5+layui异步修改排序
- openssl-1.0.0b - libssl 移植到ARM Linux
- 小程序不同页面之间通讯的解决方案 1
- python中如何下载安装库
- Win8怎么在桌面显示我的电脑
- Flutter仿写一个iOS风格的通讯录
- 华为云服务器安装win10系统,云服务器安装win10
- centos6.5安装谷歌浏览器+谷歌浏览器flash插件安装+谷歌浏览器pdf阅读器安装
- gitlab-runner 注册失败
- RESTful API设计简介
- 基于R语言的方差分析及多重比较
- 微信公众平台找自己APPID
- ffmpeg 的下载与使用
- BaiduMap---百度地图官方Demo之OpenGL绘制功能(介绍如何使用OpenGL绘制在地图中进行绘制)
- 计算机类专业入门知识
- Docker02-容器管理
- #16(total 5 problems) gdgzoi.com-contest2286【C++】