今天我的数据库hang住了,查看告警日志提示

WAITED TOO LONG FOR A ROW CACHE ENQUEUE LOCK! pid=31

AIX 5.3 是一个RAC环境,10.2.0.4

由于问题一致,我这边没有把生产环境中日志拿出来,但是我参考一个博文的,具体如下:

1.山西电信告警alert_mega.log

Mon Jun 01 02:50:03 CST 2015
>>> WAITED TOO LONG FOR A ROW CACHE ENQUEUE LOCK! pid=31
System State dumped to trace file /opt/oracle/admin/dba/udump/mega_ora_27190.trc
Tue Jun 02 02:50:03 CST 2015
>>> WAITED TOO LONG FOR A ROW CACHE ENQUEUE LOCK! pid=32
System State dumped to trace file /opt/oracle/admin/dba/udump/mega_ora_2063.trc
Tue Jun 02 17:53:40 CST 2015
>>> WAITED TOO LONG FOR A ROW CACHE ENQUEUE LOCK! pid=37
System State dumped to trace file /opt/oracle/admin/dba/udump/mega_ora_7006.trc
Tue Jun 02 18:00:41 CST 2015
>>> WAITED TOO LONG FOR A ROW CACHE ENQUEUE LOCK! pid=38
System State dumped to trace file /opt/oracle/admin/dba/udump/mega_ora_7120.trc
Wed Jun 03 02:50:02 CST 2015
>>> WAITED TOO LONG FOR A ROW CACHE ENQUEUE LOCK! pid=39
System State dumped to trace file /opt/oracle/admin/dba/udump/mega_ora_9632.trc
Wed Jun 03 20:54:39 CST 2015
>>> WAITED TOO LONG FOR A ROW CACHE ENQUEUE LOCK! pid=41
System State dumped to trace file /opt/oracle/admin/dba/udump/mega_ora_15023.trc
Wed Jun 03 20:55:07 CST 2015
>>> WAITED TOO LONG FOR A ROW CACHE ENQUEUE LOCK! pid=42
System State dumped to trace file /opt/oracle/admin/dba/udump/mega_ora_15029.trc
Wed Jun 03 20:55:26 CST 2015
>>> WAITED TOO LONG FOR A ROW CACHE ENQUEUE LOCK! pid=43
System State dumped to trace file /opt/oracle/admin/dba/udump/mega_ora_15033.trc
Thu Jun 04 02:50:02 CST 2015
>>> WAITED TOO LONG FOR A ROW CACHE ENQUEUE LOCK! pid=44
System State dumped to trace file /opt/oracle/admin/dba/udump/mega_ora_16725.trc
Fri Jun 05 02:50:02 CST 2015
>>> WAITED TOO LONG FOR A ROW CACHE ENQUEUE LOCK! pid=45
System State dumped to trace file /opt/oracle/admin/dba/udump/mega_ora_23781.trc
Sat Jun 06 02:50:03 CST 2015
>>> WAITED TOO LONG FOR A ROW CACHE ENQUEUE LOCK! pid=46
System State dumped to trace file /opt/oracle/admin/dba/udump/mega_ora_30833.trc
Sat Jun 06 23:50:03 CST 2015
>>> WAITED TOO LONG FOR A ROW CACHE ENQUEUE LOCK! pid=47
System State dumped to trace file /opt/oracle/admin/dba/udump/mega_ora_4951.trc
Sun Jun 07 02:50:02 CST 2015
>>> WAITED TOO LONG FOR A ROW CACHE ENQUEUE LOCK! pid=48
System State dumped to trace file /opt/oracle/admin/dba/udump/mega_ora_5891.trc
Mon Jun 08 02:50:02 CST 2015
>>> WAITED TOO LONG FOR A ROW CACHE ENQUEUE LOCK! pid=49
System State dumped to trace file /opt/oracle/admin/dba/udump/mega_ora_7520.trc
Tue Jun 09 02:50:02 CST 2015
>>> WAITED TOO LONG FOR A ROW CACHE ENQUEUE LOCK! pid=50
System State dumped to trace file /opt/oracle/admin/dba/udump/mega_ora_14768.trc
Wed Jun 10 02:50:02 CST 2015
>>> WAITED TOO LONG FOR A ROW CACHE ENQUEUE LOCK! pid=51
System State dumped to trace file /opt/oracle/admin/dba/udump/mega_ora_23975.trc
Wed Jun 10 22:24:05 CST 2015
>>> WAITED TOO LONG FOR A ROW CACHE ENQUEUE LOCK! pid=52
System State dumped to trace file /opt/oracle/admin/dba/udump/mega_ora_29755.trc
Wed Jun 10 22:25:03 CST 2015
>>> WAITED TOO LONG FOR A ROW CACHE ENQUEUE LOCK! pid=53
System State dumped to trace file /opt/oracle/admin/dba/udump/mega_ora_29760.trc
Thu Jun 11 02:50:02 CST 2015
>>> WAITED TOO LONG FOR A ROW CACHE ENQUEUE LOCK! pid=54
System State dumped to trace file /opt/oracle/admin/dba/udump/mega_ora_31040.trc

2.

在TRACE文件中包含一个SYSTEMSTATE DUMP ,首先通过ASS.awk来分析一下systemstate dump:

Resource Holder State
Enqueue PR-00000000-00000000    41: last wait for 'os thread startup'
      Latch c0000000c2df3b70    ??? Blocker
Rcache object=c000000f9fdf8160,    61: waiting for 'log file switch (checkpoint incomplete)'
Enqueue US-0000004C-00000000   185: waiting for 'log file switch (checkpoint incomplete)'
Enqueue FB-00000006-0186BDC8   187: waiting for 'log file switch (checkpoint incomplete)'
LOCK: handle=c000000f388db3d0   204: waiting for 'log file switch (checkpoint incomplete)'

Object Names
~~~~~~~~~~~~
Enqueue PR-00000000-00000000                               
Latch c0000000c2df3b70       holding    (efd=5) c0000000c2df3b70 slave cl
Rcache object=c000000f9fdf8160,                               
Enqueue US-0000004C-00000000                               
Enqueue FB-00000006-0186BDC8                               
LOCK: handle=c000000f388db3d0 TABL:REPORT.STATQ_AGENT_SUBS_NEW

看样子ORAPID=41的会话可能是BLOCKER,从ass生成的报告来看,系统中存在大量的log file switch(checkpoint incomplete)等待。我们首先查看一下latch c0000000c2df3b70的持有者:

PROCESS 41:
  ----------------------------------------
  SO: c000000fbe3c1910, type: 2, owner: 0000000000000000, flag: INIT/-/-/0x00
  (process) Oracle pid=41, calls cur/top: c000000f9d63cbd0/c000000fa2c63088, flag: (2) SYSTEM
            int error: 0, call error: 0, sess error: 0, txn error 0
  (post info) last post received: 0 0 33
              last post received-location: ksrpublish
              last process to post me: c000000fba3f0d80 1 6
              last post sent: 0 0 24
              last post sent-location: ksasnd
              last process posted by me: c000000fb93cbc00 1 6
    (latch info) wait_event=0 bits=1
      holding    (efd=5) c0000000c2df3b70 slave class create level=0 
        Location from where latch is held: ksvcreate: 
        Context saved from call: 0
        state=busy, wlstate=free
          waiters [orapid (seconds since: put on list, posted, alive check)]:
           48 (61788, 1251079676, 3)
           118 (61728, 1251079676, 0)
           waiter count=2
    Process Group: DEFAULT, pseudo proc: c000000fbc44e418
    O/S info: user: oracle, term: UNKNOWN, ospid: 16929 
    OSD pid info: Unix process pid: 16929, image: oracle@qdbb1 (MMON)

mmon在等待:

service name: SYS$BACKGROUND
    last wait for 'os thread startup' blocking sess=0x0000000000000000 seq=59956 wait_time=1006468 seconds since wait started=62472
                =0, =0, =0
    Dumping Session Wait History
     for 'os thread startup' count=1 wait_time=1006468
                =0, =0, =0
     for 'os thread startup' count=1 wait_time=958707
                =0, =0, =0
     for 'os thread startup' count=1 wait_time=1017506
                =0, =0, =0
     for 'os thread startup' count=1 wait_time=975671
                =0, =0, =0
     for 'os thread startup' count=1 wait_time=976846
                =0, =0, =0
     for 'os thread startup' count=1 wait_time=984219
                =0, =0, =0
     for 'os thread startup' count=1 wait_time=585799
                =0, =0, =0
     for 'os thread startup' count=1 wait_time=1355858
                =0, =0, =0
     for 'os thread startup' count=1 wait_time=979583
                =0, =0, =0
     for 'os thread startup' count=1 wait_time=990744
                =0, =0, =0
看样子mmon在启动其他进程的时候在等待启动结束:

SO: c000000f9e6e3a20, type: 16, owner: c000000fbe3c1910, flag: INIT/-/-/0x00
    (osp req holder)
    CHILD REQUESTS:
       (osp req) type=2(BACKGROUND) flags=0x20001(STATIC/-) state=8(DEAD) err=0
                 pg=129(default) arg1=0 arg2=(null) reply=(null) pname=m000
                 pid=0 parent=c000000f9e6e3a20 fulfill=0000000000000000
原来mmon在等待m000启动.那么mmon等待m000会导致整个系统HANG住吗?我们需要进一步分析

3.

我们回过头来在来看这个>>> WAITED TOO LONG FOR A ROW CACHE ENQUEUE LOCK! pid=XXX

这个等待从临晨4点多到宕机前一直存在。通过ass的结果,我们可以看到:

254:waiting for 'row cache lock'       [Rcache object=c000000f9fdf8160,] wait
255:waiting for 'row cache lock'       [Rcache object=c000000f9fdf8160,] wait
256:waiting for 'row cache lock'       [Rcache object=c000000f9fdf8160,] wait
257:waiting for 'row cache lock'       [Rcache object=c000000f9fdf8160,] wait
258:waiting for 'row cache lock'       [Rcache object=c000000f9fdf8160,] wait
259:waiting for 'row cache lock'       [Rcache object=c000000f9fdf8160,] wait
260:waiting for 'row cache lock'       [Rcache object=c000000f9fdf8160,] wait
261:waiting for 'row cache lock'       [Rcache object=c000000f9fdf8160,] wait
262:waiting for 'row cache lock'       [Rcache object=c000000f9fdf8160,] wait
263:waiting for 'row cache lock'       [Rcache object=c000000f9fdf8160,] wait
264:waiting for 'row cache lock'       [Rcache object=c000000f9fdf8160,] wait
265:waiting for 'row cache lock'       [Rcache object=c000000f9fdf8160,] wait
266:waiting for 'row cache lock'       [Rcache object=c000000f9fdf8160,] wait
267:waiting for 'row cache lock'       [Rcache object=c000000f9fdf8160,] wait
268:waiting for 'row cache lock'       [Rcache object=c000000f9fdf8160,] wait
269:waiting for 'row cache lock'       [Rcache object=c000000f9fdf8160,] wait
270:waiting for 'row cache lock'       [Rcache object=c000000f9fdf8160,] wait
271:waiting for 'row cache lock'       [Rcache object=c000000f9fdf8160,] wait
272:waiting for 'row cache lock'       [Rcache object=c000000f9fdf8160,] wait
273:waiting for 'row cache lock'       [Rcache object=c000000f9fdf8160,] wait
274:waiting for 'row cache lock'       [Rcache object=c000000f9fdf8160,] wait
275:waiting for 'row cache lock'       [Rcache object=c000000f9fdf8160,] wait
276:waiting for 'row cache lock'       [Rcache object=c000000f9fdf8160,] wait
277:waiting for 'row cache lock'       [Rcache object=c000000f9fdf8160,] wait
278:waiting for 'row cache lock'       [Rcache object=c000000f9fdf8160,] wait
279:waiting for 'row cache lock'       [Rcache object=c000000f9fdf8160,] wait
280:waiting for 'row cache lock'       [Rcache object=c000000f9fdf8160,] wait
281:waiting for 'row cache lock'       [Rcache object=c000000f9fdf8160,] wait

检查一下process 254

service name: SYS$USERS
    O/S info: user: report, term: , ospid: 17444, machine: qdbb2
              program: task@qdbb2 (TNS V1-V3)
    application name: task@qdbb2 (TNS V1-V3), hash value=516955253
    waiting for 'row cache lock' blocking sess=0x0000000000000000 seq=1 wait_time=0 seconds since wait started=3425
                cache id=7, mode=0, request=3
    Dumping Session Wait History
     for 'row cache lock' count=1 wait_time=2615950
                cache id=7, mode=0, request=3
     for 'row cache lock' count=1 wait_time=2929664
                cache id=7, mode=0, request=3
     for 'row cache lock' count=1 wait_time=2929674
                cache id=7, mode=0, request=3
     for 'row cache lock' count=1 wait_time=2929666
                cache id=7, mode=0, request=3

SO: c000000f9f9198b8, type: 50, owner: c000000ee30a3060, flag: INIT/-/-/0x00
      row cache enqueue: count=1 session=c000000fba59b660 object=c000000f9fdf8160, request=S
      savepoint=0x4
      row cache parent object: address=c000000f9fdf8160 cid=7(dc_users)
      hash=cdb2e447 typ=11 transaction=c000000faae8c710 flags=0000012a
      own=c000000f9fdf8230[c000000f9f919a08,c000000f9f919a08] wat=c000000f9fdf8240[c000000f9f9198e8,c000000f9f918b08] mode=X

这是一个dc_users的对象,请求s方式的访问,目前在等待一个mode=x的等待释放,因此我们搜索c000000f9fdf8160, mode=X,找到:

SO: c000000f9f9199d8, type: 50, owner: c000000faae8c710, flag: INIT/-/-/0x00
        row cache enqueue: count=1 session=c000000fba5f3b30 object=c000000f9fdf8160, mode=X
        savepoint=0x6
        row cache parent object: address=c000000f9fdf8160 cid=7(dc_users)
        hash=cdb2e447 typ=11 transaction=c000000faae8c710 flags=0000012a
        own=c000000f9fdf8230[c000000f9f919a08,c000000f9f919a08] wat=c000000f9fdf8240[c000000f9f9198e8,c000000f9f918b08] mode=X
        status=VALID/UPDATE/-/-/IO/-/-/-/-
        request=N release=TRUE flags=0
        instance lock id=QH b6ae8f92 4cc6da8c
        set=0, complete=FALSE
        set=1, complete=FALSE
        set=2, complete=FALSE
就是这个会话持有了这个dc_users的row cache object,而且持有方式是不兼容的,往前看,发现这个会话是:

PROCESS 61:
  ----------------------------------------
  SO: c000000fbf3bfe48, type: 2, owner: 0000000000000000, flag: INIT/-/-/0x00
  (process) Oracle pid=61, calls cur/top: c000000fa0c0eb30/c000000f8b0fdef8, flag: (0) -
            int error: 0, call error: 0, sess error: 0, txn error 0
  (post info) last post received: 109 0 4
              last post received-location: kslpsr
              last process to post me: c000000fbc3c2d98 1 6
              last post sent: 0 0 24
              last post sent-location: ksasnd
              last process posted by me: c000000fbc3c2d98 1 6
    (latch info) wait_event=109 bits=0
    Process Group: DEFAULT, pseudo proc: c000000fbc44e418
    O/S info: user: oracle, term: UNKNOWN, ospid: 2006 
    OSD pid info: Unix process pid: 2006, image: oracle@qdbb1

SO: c000000fba5f3b30, type: 4, owner: c000000fbf3bfe48, flag: INIT/-/-/0x00
    (session) sid: 1973 trans: c000000faae8c710, creator: c000000fbf3bfe48, flag: (41) USR/- BSY/-/-/-/-/-
              DID: 0001-003D-041A6D36, short-term DID: 0000-0000-00000000
              txn branch: 0000000000000000
              oct: 0, prv: 0, sql: 0000000000000000, psql: 0000000000000000, user: 0/SYS
    service name: SYS$USERS
    O/S info: user: liping, term: L902054, ospid: 163000:163128, machine: 
              program: plsqldev.exe
    application name: plsqldev.exe, hash value=2126984564
    waiting for 'log file switch (checkpoint incomplete)' blocking sess=0x0000000000000000 seq=9 wait_time=0 seconds since wait started=2290
                =0, =0, =0
    Dumping Session Wait History
     for 'log file switch (checkpoint incomplete)' count=1 wait_time=87117
                =0, =0, =0
     for 'log file switch (checkpoint incomplete)' count=1 wait_time=976593
                =0, =0, =0
     for 'log file switch (checkpoint incomplete)' count=1 wait_time=979179
                =0, =0, =0
     for 'log file switch (checkpoint incomplete)' count=1 wait_time=7099
                =0, =0, =0
     for 'log file switch (checkpoint incomplete)' count=1 wait_time=976471
                =0, =0, =0
     for 'log file switch (checkpoint incomplete)' count=1 wait_time=976611
                =0, =0, =0
     for 'log file switch (checkpoint incomplete)' count=1 wait_time=973437
                =0, =0, =0
     for 'log file switch (checkpoint incomplete)' count=1 wait_time=969860
                =0, =0, =0
     for 'log file switch (checkpoint incomplete)' count=1 wait_time=976535
                =0, =0, =0
     for 'log file switch (checkpoint incomplete)' count=1 wait_time=978815
                =0, =0, =0
这是一个PL/SQL DEVELOPER的用户,不过从上面的情况看,这个会话是产生了阻塞大量会话的源头,不过这个会话本身也是受害者,在等待log file switch(checkpoint incomplete),为什么会这样呢?

4.

于是我们来看看lgwr的状态:

SO: c000000fba6167c0, type: 4, owner: c000000fbc3c2d98, flag: INIT/-/-/0x00
    (session) sid: 2155 trans: 0000000000000000, creator: c000000fbc3c2d98, flag: (51) USR/- BSY/-/-/-/-/-
              DID: 0001-0024-00000005, short-term DID: 0000-0000-00000000
              txn branch: 0000000000000000
              oct: 0, prv: 0, sql: 0000000000000000, psql: 0000000000000000, user: 0/SYS
    service name: SYS$BACKGROUND
    waiting for 'rdbms ipc message' blocking sess=0x0000000000000000 seq=13185 wait_time=0 seconds since wait started=0
                timeout=d3, =0, =0
    Dumping Session Wait History
     for 'control file sequential read' count=1 wait_time=233
                file#=0, block#=2e, blocks=1
     for 'control file sequential read' count=1 wait_time=210
                file#=0, block#=2c, blocks=1
     for 'control file sequential read' count=1 wait_time=255
                file#=0, block#=29, blocks=1
     for 'control file sequential read' count=1 wait_time=213
                file#=0, block#=27, blocks=1
     for 'control file sequential read' count=1 wait_time=222
                file#=2, block#=1, blocks=1
     for 'control file sequential read' count=1 wait_time=221
                file#=1, block#=1, blocks=1
     for 'control file sequential read' count=1 wait_time=282
                file#=0, block#=1, blocks=1
     for 'rdbms ipc message' count=1 wait_time=4564
                timeout=d4, =0, =0
     for 'rdbms ipc message' count=1 wait_time=3188
                timeout=d4, =0, =0
     for 'rdbms ipc message' count=1 wait_time=1
                timeout=d4, =0, =0

LGWR居然在等待ipc message,说明lgwr并没有处于工作状态,或者无事可做,或者等待其他会话处理结束后唤醒它。而目前大家都在等待log file switch,lgwr没有闲着没事做的理由,因此我们有理由相信checkpoint出问题了,lgwr是在等待ckpt完成工作,于是我们继续检查ckpt的状态:

5.

搜索(ckpt)

SO: c000000fbb632130, type: 4, owner: c000000fbb40bc08, flag: INIT/-/-/0x00
    (session) sid: 2154 trans: 0000000000000000, creator: c000000fbb40bc08, flag: (51) USR/- BSY/-/-/-/-/-
              DID: 0001-0025-00000004, short-term DID: 0001-0025-00000005
              txn branch: 0000000000000000
              oct: 0, prv: 0, sql: 0000000000000000, psql: 0000000000000000, user: 0/SYS
    service name: SYS$BACKGROUND
    waiting for 'enq: PR - contention' blocking sess=0xc000000fbf5e4278 seq=61352 wait_time=0 seconds since wait started=62446
                name|mode=50520006, 0=0, 0=0
    Dumping Session Wait History
     for 'enq: PR - contention' count=1 wait_time=429069
                name|mode=50520006, 0=0, 0=0

for 'enq: PR - contention' count=1 wait_time=2929688
                name|mode=50520006, 0=0, 0=0
     for 'enq: PR - contention' count=1 wait_time=2929668
                name|mode=50520006, 0=0, 0=0
     for 'enq: PR - contention' count=1 wait_time=2929682
                name|mode=50520006, 0=0, 0=0
     for 'enq: PR - contention' count=1 wait_time=2929671
                name|mode=50520006, 0=0, 0=0
     for 'enq: PR - contention' count=1 wait_time=2929679
                name|mode=50520006, 0=0, 0=0
     for 'enq: PR - contention' count=1 wait_time=2929666
                name|mode=50520006, 0=0, 0=0
     for 'enq: PR - contention' count=1 wait_time=2929683
                name|mode=50520006, 0=0, 0=0
     for 'enq: PR - contention' count=1 wait_time=2929624
                name|mode=50520006, 0=0, 0=0
     for 'enq: PR - contention' count=1 wait_time=2929676
                name|mode=50520006, 0=0, 0=0

ckpt一直在等待PR锁,这回我们终于看到了blocking sess=0xc000000fbf5e4278 ,这个会话就是阻塞ckpt的元凶,我们来看看是谁:

SO: c000000fbf5e4278, type: 4, owner: c000000fbe3c1910, flag: INIT/-/-/0x00
    (session) sid: 2150 trans: 0000000000000000, creator: c000000fbe3c1910, flag: (100051) USR/- BSY/-/-/-/-/-
              DID: 0001-0029-00000002, short-term DID: 0001-0029-00000003
              txn branch: 0000000000000000
              oct: 0, prv: 0, sql: c000000fa3ed29b8, psql: 0000000000000000, user: 0/SYS
    service name: SYS$BACKGROUND
    last wait for 'os thread startup' blocking sess=0x0000000000000000 seq=59956 wait_time=1006468 seconds since wait started=62472
                =0, =0, =0
我们又找到了mmon,原来mmon才是导致系统HANG住的元凶。

6.

案例总结:

1、到目前为止,我们弄清楚了系统HANG住的主要原因是MMON启动m000的时候,m000没能够正常启动,导致mmon长期持有pr锁,阻塞了ckpt,导致无法正常做日志切换,但是mmon未能正常启动m000的原因还没有找到,这需要更多的资料进行分析,不在本文讨论之内

2、碰到这种问题如何处理?实际上如果我们分析清楚了,只要杀掉mmon进程,或者调整一下一下statistics_level就可能解决问题,而不需要重启实例。但是这个分析需要时间,最起码也需要30-60分钟的分析时间,如果在生产环境下发生,很难给我们这么长的分析时间。但是大家要注意这个问题的出现时在4点多钟,系统HANG住是在10点多钟,中间有很长时间供我们分析。如果我们能及时发现这个异常,是可能在系统HANG住钱解决问题的

本文转自xiaocao1314051CTO博客,原文链接:http://blog.51cto.com/xiaocao13140/1970622 ,如需转载请自行联系原作者

WAITED TOO LONG FOR A ROW CACHE ENQUEUE LOCK!的分析相关推荐

  1. oracle WAITED TOO LONG FOR A ROW CACHE ENQUEUE LOCK问题分析

    服务概述 财务系统出现业务卡顿,数据库实例2遇到>>> WAITED TOO LONG FOR A ROW CACHE ENQUEUE LOCK! <<<错误导致业 ...

  2. Troubleshooting: WAITED TOO LONG FOR A ROW CACHE ENQUEUE LOCK! (文档 ID 278316.1)

    目录(?)[-] APPLIES TO PURPOSE TROUBLESHOOTING STEPS What is a Row Cache Enqueue Lock What is the meani ...

  3. WAITED TOO LONG FOR A ROW CACHE ENQUEUE LOCK!

            相关文章:<cursor: pin S wait on X等待事件的处理过程>http://space.itpub.net/23135684/viewspace-73169 ...

  4. WAITED TOO LONG FOR A ROW CACHE ENQUEUE LOCK

    现象: 1.数据库ALERT持续报如下错误,一段时间后数据库实例Hang住无法使用 Wed Oct 26 09:10:52 2011 >>> WAITED TOO LONG FOR ...

  5. Troubleshooting: WAITED TOO LONG FOR A ROW CACHE ENQUEUE LOCK!

     [ID 278316.1] 修改时间 16-OCT-2011     类型 TROUBLESHOOTING     状态 PUBLISHED   In this Document   Purpose ...

  6. latch: row cache objects等待dc_rollback_segments的处理

    上午有客户遇到UNDO空间问题导致的latch: row cache objects (dc_rollback_segments ),经排查为节点2的UNDO表空间使用率100%,大部分为UNEXPI ...

  7. 【等待事件】序列等待事件总结(enq: SQ - contention、row cache lock、DFS lock handle和enq: SV - contention)...

    [等待事件]序列等待事件总结(enq: SQ - contention.row cache lock.DFS lock handle和enq: SV - contention) [等待事件]序列等待事 ...

  8. oracle redo wait较高,【案例】Oracle等待事件latch:row cache objects原因和解决办法

    [案例]Oracle等待事件latch:row cache objects原因和解决办法 时间:2016-11-05 13:41   来源:Oracle研究中心   作者:HTZ   点击: 次 天萃 ...

  9. Oracle Row cache lock图解

    Oracle Row cache lock(dictionary cache)图解   转载于:https://blog.51cto.com/maclean/1278273

最新文章

  1. 1分钟、2束光,3D打印出一座“柏林地标”,精度高于发丝 | Nature
  2. 在Python中实现SVM分类
  3. 操作系统复习--OS的运行机制和体系结构
  4. mysql子查询存到另一张表_MySQL多表查询与子查询
  5. Linux线程——线程安全问题
  6. C/C++中Static和Const的作用
  7. Coursera自动驾驶课程第14讲:Linear and Nonlinear Kalman Filters
  8. Android已申请动态权限报错,Android 读取或者写入U盘时,报错:Permission denied
  9. 制作了一个WMI 查询分析工具
  10. linux 添加新的系统调用,如何在Linux中添加新的系统调用
  11. 教你大数据必修三大技能 快快记录下来
  12. IT程序员常去的论坛、社区、网站有哪些?
  13. Windows语言栏不见了,解决办法。任务栏的语言栏没了、不显示了。语言栏异常导致不能输入中文。默认中文输入法设置。
  14. NIO源码解析-FileChannel
  15. 京训钉怎么快速看完_在钉钉用培训机构CRM管理系统,助力协同办公一体化
  16. 计算机图形学图形旋转_计算机图形学中的旋转
  17. 【Linux系统编程】守护进程、线程
  18. 仿微信图片查看器入场退场动画
  19. 科普:SAS是什么语言
  20. 棱镜门事件将唤起用户对个人隐私的关注和重视

热门文章

  1. 谷歌浏览器崩溃设置崩溃_让它崩溃
  2. python程序基础网课答案_Python程序设计基础智慧树网课答案
  3. aecmap快捷键_ArcGIS编辑操作的常用快捷键
  4. 片上总线Wishbone 学习(四)接口信号定义
  5. android开发发送短信,Android开发入门之发送短信
  6. 9-java.sql.SQLException: Incorrect string value: ‘\xE9\x82\xA3\xE5\xB0\xB1‘ for column ‘content‘
  7. 百度百科创建个人词条怎么写?
  8. 【Unity Editor编辑器】 代码获取project面板选中资源路径(自定义右键菜单)
  9. 滴滴 2019校园招聘笔试编程题-2018.09.18
  10. 微信成语接龙小程序|微擎框架|带流量主|前端+后端完整源码